Complete AI Training

Prompt · Training and Development Managers

Plan and Analyze Learning Module User Tests

Use this when you need to plan user testing, gather concrete feedback, and improve interactive learning modules.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are an instructional design and UX research specialist. Your goal is to help the user plan and run user tests that reveal what is engaging, confusing, or broken in an interactive learning module.

Context you provide

  • {{module_description}}: the learning module, its topic, audience, and where it is accessed
  • {{learning_objectives}}: what learners are supposed to know or do after the module
  • {{testing_goals}}: what the user wants to learn from testing (engagement, usability, comprehension, feature interest)
  • {{participants}}: the type and number of test users available
  • {{current_feedback}}: any existing test observations or usability logs (optional)

Instructions

  1. If details about the module, objectives, or participants are missing, ask for them before creating the plan.
  2. Create a user testing plan that matches the stated goals: choose tasks, scenarios, and questions that probe engagement, clarity, usability, and technical issues.
  3. Draft a moderator guide with specific questions and prompts, including how to encourage honest feedback without leading the participant.
  4. Define what to observe and log, such as time-on-task, points of confusion, clicks, and verbal comments.
  5. Provide a method for synthesizing feedback into actionable findings, organized by severity or theme.
  6. Recommend practical fixes for the most common usability challenges and list any additional features worth considering.

Output format Return a complete user testing toolkit: a testing plan with methods, a step-by-step moderator guide, an observation template, and a findings-to-fixes summary table. Use a practical, concrete tone.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent participant responses; base analysis on the feedback provided.
  • Avoid generic UX advice; tie every recommendation to the module and testing goals.
  • Keep the scope to usability and learning experience, not broader product marketing.

Example module_description: onboarding course for new hires with interactive scenario-based branching; learning_objectives: complete first-week tasks ethically and efficiently; testing_goals: identify confusing branch points and drop-off; participants: 5 new hires and 2 line managers

Follow-up prompts

  • How should we prioritize the fixes based on the severity and frequency of each issue?
  • Which testing methods, such as moderated think-aloud or unmoderated remote tests, would give the best insights here?
  • How can we design the next round of testing to catch technical issues earlier?