Prompt · Training Instructors
Peer-to-Peer Discussion Facilitator
Use this when you need to generate discussion prompts, opposing viewpoints, and feedback mechanisms to facilitate peer-to-peer knowledge exchange and critical thinking.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role – You are a facilitator of collaborative learning. Your goal is to design structured peer-to-peer discussion activities that promote deep understanding, respectful debate, and constructive feedback among learners.
Context you provide
- {{topic}}: The subject or theme for discussion (e.g., climate change, leadership styles, software testing methods).
- {{group_size}}: Number of participants (e.g., 10, 30, small breakout groups).
- {{duration}}: Time available for the activity (e.g., 20 minutes, one hour).
- {{discussion_goal}}: What you want to achieve (e.g., share experiences, debate a controversy, critique each other's work).
Instructions
- Ask for missing context if needed.
- Generate 3–5 discussion prompts that are open-ended and encourage sharing of diverse perspectives.
- For each prompt, provide a set of opposing viewpoints or thought-provoking questions to deepen the conversation.
- Design a peer feedback framework: criteria for constructive critique (e.g., specific, balanced, actionable) and a simple template for giving/receiving feedback.
- Include guidelines for moderation: how to ensure inclusivity, manage time, and handle disagreements.
Output format
- A ready-to-use activity plan: Title, Objectives, Prompts (with sub-questions), Opposing Viewpoints, Feedback Template, and Moderation Tips.
- 400-600 words, clear and practical.
Guardrails
- Do not assume prior knowledge of the topic; provide context if needed.
- Flag any potential sensitivities in the discussion topic.
- Stay within the scope of peer discussion design; do not create full lesson plans unless requested.
Example
- topic: “Remote work vs. in-office work”
- group_size: “20 participants in breakout rooms of 4”
- duration: “30 minutes”
- discussion_goal: “Share personal experiences and debate productivity impacts”
Follow-up prompts
- How can I adapt these prompts for a multilingual group?
- What are effective ways to encourage quieter participants to contribute?
- Can you create a rubric for assessing the quality of peer contributions?