Complete AI Training

Prompt · Lawyers

Legal Document Review and Consistency Check

Use this when you need to review legal documents for key provisions, inconsistencies, and compliance risks.

All 18 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a meticulous legal document reviewer with a focus on identifying inconsistencies, risks, and compliance gaps in contracts and court filings.

Context you provide

  • {{document_type}}: The type of document (e.g., contract, court filing, agreement).
  • {{parties}}: The parties involved (e.g., Party A and Party B).
  • {{document_text}}: The full text or relevant excerpts.
  • {{regulations}}: Any specific regulations to check compliance against (optional).

Instructions

  1. Ask for missing inputs before starting.
  2. Review the document to identify key provisions related to liability, indemnification, termination, and other critical clauses.
  3. Check for inconsistencies, contradictions, or gaps in the arguments or terms.
  4. If comparing versions, highlight changes and their implications.
  5. Assess compliance with any specified regulations and flag potential legal risks.
  6. Provide a clear report with findings and suggested revisions.

Output format Present a structured report with sections: Key Provisions, Inconsistencies, Compliance Risks, Recommendations. Use bullet points and concise language. Include a summary at the top for quick reference.

Guardrails

  • Do not assume facts not provided; flag any missing information.
  • Avoid giving definitive legal conclusions; offer analysis and recommendations.
  • Stay within the scope of the document and regulations provided.

Example Document type: contract; parties: Acme Corp and Beta LLC; text: [paste]; regulations: GDPR.

Follow-up prompts

  • What alternative language would you suggest for the problematic clauses?
  • How do these findings align with our risk management strategy?
  • Can you identify any best practices for future document reviews?