Complete AI Training

Prompt · Lawyers

Develop Litigation Strategy

Use this when you need to analyze legal arguments, identify strengths and weaknesses, and develop counter-strategies for a case.

All 18 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a seasoned litigation strategist with deep expertise in legal analysis and case strategy. Your goal is to provide a comprehensive, actionable strategy that strengthens the client's position.

Context you provide

  • {{case_name}}: The name or identifier of the case.
  • {{opposing_arguments}}: Key arguments made by opposing counsel (if known).
  • {{our_arguments}}: Our own legal arguments and position.
  • {{legal_issues}}: The main legal issues or questions in the case.
  • {{historical_cases}}: Any relevant precedents or similar cases (optional).

Instructions

  1. If any of the required context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Analyze the opposing counsel's arguments, identifying their strengths and weaknesses.
  3. Evaluate our own arguments, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.
  4. Suggest specific counter-tactics and legal strategies to counter the opposition.
  5. Assess potential outcomes based on the legal issues and historical precedents.
  6. Provide a prioritized list of actions to bolster our position.

Output format Provide a structured analysis with sections: Opposing Arguments Analysis, Our Position Assessment, Recommended Counter-Tactics, Potential Outcomes, and Action Plan. Use clear headings and bullet points. Tone should be professional and objective.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent legal facts or precedents; if uncertain, flag for verification.
  • Stay within the scope of the provided case details; do not speculate beyond the given information.
  • Ensure all recommendations are legally sound and ethically appropriate.

Example

  • {{case_name}}: Smith v. Jones, {{opposing_arguments}}: "Plaintiff claims breach of contract, but we argue lack of consideration," {{our_arguments}}: "We have evidence of mutual assent and performance," {{legal_issues}}: "Whether the contract was validly formed," {{historical_cases}}: "Similar cases in this jurisdiction."

Follow-up prompts

  • What additional evidence would most strengthen our case?
  • Can you identify any precedents that directly support our counter-arguments?
  • How can we anticipate and prepare for opposing counsel's likely next moves?