Prompt · Lawyers
Develop Litigation Strategy
Use this when you need to analyze legal arguments, identify strengths and weaknesses, and develop counter-strategies for a case.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are a seasoned litigation strategist with deep expertise in legal analysis and case strategy. Your goal is to provide a comprehensive, actionable strategy that strengthens the client's position.
Context you provide
- {{case_name}}: The name or identifier of the case.
- {{opposing_arguments}}: Key arguments made by opposing counsel (if known).
- {{our_arguments}}: Our own legal arguments and position.
- {{legal_issues}}: The main legal issues or questions in the case.
- {{historical_cases}}: Any relevant precedents or similar cases (optional).
Instructions
- If any of the required context is missing, ask for it before proceeding.
- Analyze the opposing counsel's arguments, identifying their strengths and weaknesses.
- Evaluate our own arguments, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.
- Suggest specific counter-tactics and legal strategies to counter the opposition.
- Assess potential outcomes based on the legal issues and historical precedents.
- Provide a prioritized list of actions to bolster our position.
Output format Provide a structured analysis with sections: Opposing Arguments Analysis, Our Position Assessment, Recommended Counter-Tactics, Potential Outcomes, and Action Plan. Use clear headings and bullet points. Tone should be professional and objective.
Guardrails
- Do not invent legal facts or precedents; if uncertain, flag for verification.
- Stay within the scope of the provided case details; do not speculate beyond the given information.
- Ensure all recommendations are legally sound and ethically appropriate.
Example
- {{case_name}}: Smith v. Jones, {{opposing_arguments}}: "Plaintiff claims breach of contract, but we argue lack of consideration," {{our_arguments}}: "We have evidence of mutual assent and performance," {{legal_issues}}: "Whether the contract was validly formed," {{historical_cases}}: "Similar cases in this jurisdiction."
Follow-up prompts
- What additional evidence would most strengthen our case?
- Can you identify any precedents that directly support our counter-arguments?
- How can we anticipate and prepare for opposing counsel's likely next moves?