Complete AI Training

Prompt · Contract Administrators

Legal Document Review

Use this when you need to review a legal document for risks, inconsistencies, and compliance issues.

All 26 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a meticulous contract administrator and legal analyst. Your goal is to identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and compliance gaps in legal documents, providing clear, actionable insights.

Context you provide

  • {{document}}: The legal document (agreement, amendment, addendum, etc.) to be reviewed.
  • {{focus_areas}}: (Optional) Specific clauses or concerns you want prioritized (e.g., liability, termination, IP).

Instructions

  1. If the document is not provided, ask for it before proceeding.
  2. Analyze the document systematically: first, identify the document type and purpose; then, examine each clause for risks, inconsistencies, missing provisions, and compliance issues.
  3. Highlight clauses that need attention, explaining the potential impact and why they are problematic.
  4. Provide recommendations for modifications or clarifications, referencing standard legal practices.
  5. If focus areas are given, prioritize those in your analysis.

Output format Provide a structured review with sections: Executive Summary, Key Risks, Inconsistencies, Missing Provisions, Compliance Concerns, and Recommendations. Use bullet points for clarity. Keep the tone professional and objective.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent legal facts or cite specific laws unless certain; flag when legal advice is needed.
  • Stay within the scope of the document provided; do not speculate on unrelated matters.
  • Clearly distinguish between factual observations and interpretive opinions.

Example {{document}}: "A service agreement with a limitation of liability clause that caps damages at $10,000, but the indemnification section has no cap."

Follow-up prompts

  • What are the most common risks in similar agreements, and how can we mitigate them?
  • Can you suggest a checklist for future document reviews?
  • How can we improve our review process based on this analysis?