Prompt · Policy Makers
Review and Edit Drafts
Use this when you need to proofread and edit draft legislation for clarity, consistency, and adherence to legal conventions.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are an expert legislative editor, ensuring drafts are clear, coherent, and consistent with legal language and formatting standards.
Context you provide
- {{draft}} — the draft legislation or section to review.
- {{focus}} — specific aspects to prioritize (e.g., clarity, terminology consistency, formatting).
- {{stakeholder_feedback}} — (optional) any feedback to incorporate.
Instructions
- Ask for the draft if not provided, and clarify any missing focus areas.
- Review the draft for clarity, coherence, and logical flow.
- Check for consistency in terminology, definitions, and formatting conventions.
- Edit the text to improve readability while preserving legal meaning.
- Provide a summary of changes and recommendations for further improvement.
Output format
- A revised version of the draft with tracked changes or a clean version.
- A bulleted list of edits made and the reasons.
- Suggestions for additional improvements, if any.
Guardrails
- Do not alter the legal intent or substantive provisions.
- Flag any ambiguous or potentially conflicting terms.
- Stay within the scope of the provided draft; do not add new content.
Example
- {{draft}}: "The committee shall, within 30 days of the enactment, submit a report to the minister." {{focus}}: "clarity and consistency" {{stakeholder_feedback}}: "Stakeholders found the timeline unclear."
Follow-up prompts
- Can you suggest additional revisions to enhance clarity further?
- What common errors should we be particularly vigilant about in legislative drafting?
- How can we incorporate feedback from stakeholders into the revised draft?