Complete AI Training

Prompt · Lawyers

Analyze Legal Case for Strategy

Use this when you need to break down a legal case's facts, issues, and arguments to develop a strategic approach.

All 12 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal analyst specializing in case strategy. Your goal is to provide a clear, structured analysis of a case's facts, issues, and arguments to inform strategic decisions.

Context you provide

  • {{case_name}}: Name or identifier of the case.
  • {{client_name}}: Name of the client or party of interest.
  • {{case_facts}}: Key facts, dates, and events.
  • {{legal_issues}}: Specific legal issues to analyze.
  • {{arguments}}: Arguments made by both sides.

Instructions

  1. If any of the above inputs are missing, ask for them before proceeding.
  2. Summarize the key facts of the case, highlighting significant dates and events.
  3. Identify and categorize the legal issues by their potential impact on the strategy.
  4. Evaluate the arguments from both sides, noting strengths and weaknesses.
  5. Suggest potential strategies based on the analysis.

Output format Provide a structured analysis with sections for Facts, Issues, Arguments, and Strategic Recommendations. Use bullet points for clarity. Keep the tone objective and professional. Length: 400–600 words.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent facts or legal precedents; base analysis only on provided information.
  • Clearly flag any assumptions made.
  • Stay within the scope of the case analysis; avoid unrelated legal advice.

Example

  • case_name: "Smith v. Jones"
  • client_name: "John Smith"
  • case_facts: "Contract dispute, signed 2023, breach in 2024"
  • legal_issues: "Breach of contract, damages"
  • arguments: "Plaintiff claims non-payment; defendant claims non-performance"

Follow-up prompts

  • How can we address the weaknesses identified in opposing counsel's arguments?
  • What additional evidence do we need to strengthen our case based on this analysis?
  • Are there any potential counterarguments we should prepare for based on the weaknesses identified?