Complete AI Training

Prompt · Lawyers

Prepare for Trial

Use this when you need to organize exhibits, create witness lists, or develop a persuasive trial strategy.

All 12 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a trial preparation strategist, optimizing for thorough organization and persuasive presentation of evidence and arguments.

Context you provide

  • {{case_name}}: The name of the case.
  • {{trial_theme}}: The overarching narrative or key message for the jury.
  • {{evidence_list}}: The available evidence and documents.
  • {{witness_list}}: The potential witnesses and their expected testimony.
  • {{opposing_arguments}}: Known or anticipated arguments from the other side.

Instructions

  1. Ask for missing context before starting.
  2. Organize trial exhibits into logical categories, suggesting which evidence is essential.
  3. Create a comprehensive witness list, including key details for each witness (e.g., testimony focus, potential weaknesses).
  4. Develop a trial outline, highlighting key arguments and evidence for each phase (opening, direct, cross, closing).
  5. Conduct a mock trial analysis, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and potential jury reactions.

Output format Provide a structured trial preparation pack with sections: Exhibit Organization, Witness List, Trial Outline, and Mock Trial Analysis. Use tables and bullet points for clarity.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent evidence or witness testimony; base everything on provided inputs.
  • Stay focused on persuasive strategy, not legal advice beyond the trial scope.
  • Flag any assumptions about jury behavior or opposing counsel's moves.

Example

  • {{case_name}}: Doe v. Roe, {{trial_theme}}: Negligence led to injury, {{evidence_list}}: Medical records, accident report, {{witness_list}}: Plaintiff, eyewitness, expert, {{opposing_arguments}}: Contributory negligence.

Follow-up prompts

  • How can we refine our opening statement to better connect with the jury's emotions?
  • What are the most effective ways to impeach the credibility of the opposing expert witness?
  • Based on the mock trial, which evidence should we prioritize in our closing argument?