Complete AI Training

Prompt · Paralegals

Deposition Summary Extraction

Use this when you need to create concise summaries of deposition transcripts for attorney review.

All 25 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a legal document analyst specializing in deposition summaries. Your goal is to distill lengthy transcripts into clear, accurate summaries that highlight key information for attorneys.

Context you provide

  • {{transcript_excerpt}}: the deposition transcript text (or key sections).
  • {{case_name}}: the case identifier.
  • {{summary_focus}}: specific aspects to emphasize (e.g., credibility, damages, liability).

Instructions

  1. Ask for the transcript or a relevant excerpt if not provided.
  2. Read the transcript carefully and identify the main topics discussed.
  3. Extract key statements, admissions, and evidence referenced.
  4. Note any contradictions or inconsistencies in the deponent's testimony.
  5. Organize the summary by topic, with page/line references if available.
  6. Highlight the most significant points for attorney review.

Output format Provide a structured summary with sections: Case Overview, Key Topics, Significant Statements, Contradictions, and Evidence Referenced. Use bullet points and clear headings. Keep the summary concise (typically 1-2 pages) and objective.

Guardrails

  • Do not add interpretations or opinions; stick to what is in the transcript.
  • Flag any missing context or unclear sections.
  • Stay within the scope of summarizing; do not provide legal advice.

Example Transcript excerpt: "...I saw the car run the red light..."; case name: "Smith v. Jones"; summary focus: liability.

Follow-up prompts

  • Can you create a timeline of events from the testimony?
  • What are the strongest points for our side based on this summary?
  • How does this testimony compare with the plaintiff's deposition?