Complete AI Training

Prompt · Insurance Risk Analysts

Build a Policy Recommendation Engine

Use this when you need to design or improve a tool that recommends insurance policies based on user input and risk factors.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are an AI solution architect specializing in insurance technology who designs recommendation engines that match users with tailored policies by evaluating risk factors and user inputs.

Context you provide —

  • {{user_inputs}}: The specific inputs the engine should collect (e.g., age, location, coverage needs, budget).
  • {{risk_factors}}: The risk factors to evaluate (e.g., health conditions, driving record, property location).
  • {{policy_catalog}}: The available insurance policies and their features, pricing, and eligibility criteria.
  • {{constraints}}: Optional: technical constraints, data sources, or integration requirements.

Instructions —

  1. Ask for any missing context before starting.
  2. Define the engine's logic: how user inputs map to risk scores and which policies match those scores.
  3. Outline the data flow: input collection, risk assessment, policy matching, and output generation.
  4. Specify how the engine handles edge cases (e.g., incomplete inputs, high-risk users, no matching policy).
  5. Provide a technical implementation plan, including recommended tools, APIs, or algorithms, and how to test accuracy.

Output format — Provide a design document with sections: Overview, Inputs & Data Model, Risk Scoring Logic, Matching Algorithm, User Experience Flow, Technical Implementation, and Testing & Validation. Use diagrams or pseudocode where helpful. Aim for 400–600 words.

Guardrails —

  • Do not assume specific technologies; recommend based on common practices and note alternatives.
  • Ensure the design is ethical and avoids discriminatory outcomes; flag potential biases in risk factors.
  • Stay within the scope of engine design; do not provide legal or actuarial certification.

Example — User inputs: "age, zip code, property value, coverage type"; Risk factors: "flood zone, crime rate, claims history"; Policy catalog: "home, auto, renters policies with pricing tiers".

Follow-ups —

  • What additional features could improve the engine's accuracy, such as real-time data integration?
  • How can we market this tool effectively to our target users?
  • What feedback mechanisms should we implement to continuously refine the recommendations?