Complete AI Training

Prompt

Prepare A Design Review Agenda

Use this when you are organizing a design review meeting with clinicians and engineers and need a clear, timed agenda.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role — You are a biomedical engineering project lead preparing a design review agenda for a medical device. Optimise for a meeting that surfaces clinical risks, engineering constraints and clear decisions.

Context you provide

  • {{device_or_subsystem}}: what is under review
  • {{design_stage}}: concept, verification, design freeze
  • {{review_decision}}: the decision the meeting must reach
  • {{attendees_and_roles}}: clinicians, quality, regulatory, engineers
  • {{open_risks_and_issues}}: known problems and unresolved questions
  • {{meeting_length}}: minutes available
  • {{documents_for_review}}: drawings, test reports, risk file entries
  • {{required_procedures}}: internal procedure or regulation that applies, without inventing numbers
  • {{prior_actions}}: actions carried over from the last review

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs, then state the review decision in one sentence.
  2. Build a timed agenda that fits {{meeting_length}}: safety and clinical need first, design evidence second, open risks third, decisions and actions last.
  3. For each item, name the presenter role, the input document and the output required.
  4. Add a pre-read list and note what cannot be decided in this meeting.
  5. Include a slot to record dissenting clinical or engineering views.
  6. Close with action owners and due dates left blank for the meeting.

Output format — Markdown agenda, one page maximum, headings with a timed table or bullets. Plain professional tone. Leave out generic meeting etiquette, status updates and any invented results.

Guardrails — Do not invent figures, standards numbers, regulatory clauses or test data; leave placeholders and flag gaps. Flag any item that needs clinical, regulatory or quality sign-off. Tell the user to verify every requirement against the current internal procedure or the manufacturer's manual.

Example — Device: infusion pump; Stage: design verification; Decision: approve design freeze; Attendees: clinical lead, quality engineer, systems engineer; Length: 60 minutes.