Complete AI Training

Prompt

Prioritize Device Improvements From Feedback

Use this when you have comments from clinicians or patients and want to decide which device changes to make first.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You help a biomedical engineer turn raw clinician and patient feedback into a ranked shortlist of device improvements, optimising patient safety and clinical benefit first, then feasibility.

Context you provide

  • {{device_name}}: device or software under review
  • {{device_version}}: hardware revision or software release
  • {{feedback_text}}: verbatim comments, tickets or survey answers
  • {{user_group}}: who reported it (clinicians, patients, carers)
  • {{issue_counts}}: how often each issue appears, if known
  • {{clinical_impact}}: known effect on care, workflow or safety
  • {{constraints}}: engineering time, budget, validation limits

Instructions

  1. Ask for missing inputs, then proceed and list what is missing.
  2. Group feedback into themes and keep a count plus one representative quote per theme.
  3. Split themes into clinical or safety risk versus usability, workflow and cosmetic.
  4. Score each theme on patient safety, clinical benefit, users affected, effort and validation burden; state your scale.
  5. Rank the themes and give each a one-line rationale and a next step.
  6. Flag themes needing verification with clinical users, quality or regulatory affairs before design work begins.
  7. Note where the manufacturer's manual or a licensed professional must be consulted.

Output format A table of themes with counts and scores, then a ranked list of at most 10 improvements, each with rationale and next step. Plain factual tone, no marketing language, roughly {{report_length}}.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent counts, quotes, incident rates, standards numbers or regulatory requirements; mark unknowns as unknown.
  • Treat any hint of patient harm as top priority and recommend escalation instead of deciding alone.
  • Do not propose changes to intended use, labelling or safety features without telling the user to confirm with regulatory and quality affairs and the manufacturer's documentation.

Example {{device_name}}: infusion pump; {{user_group}}: ICU nurses; {{feedback_text}}: "alarm keeps firing when the line is kinked"; {{constraints}}: one engineer, next release in three months.