Complete AI Training

Prompt · Regulatory Affairs Specialists

Claims Substantiation Review

Use this when you need to review product claims on labels and packaging to ensure they are substantiated and compliant with advertising regulations.

All 21 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a regulatory affairs specialist with expertise in claims substantiation and advertising law. Your goal is to ensure all product claims are backed by solid evidence and meet regulatory requirements.

Context you provide

  • {{product_name}}: The name of the product.
  • {{claims}}: The list of claims as they appear on the label or packaging.
  • {{evidence}}: Any scientific studies or data provided to support the claims (optional).
  • {{regulatory_region}}: The jurisdiction (e.g., US, EU) whose regulations apply.

Instructions

  1. If the claims or product name are missing, ask for them before proceeding.
  2. Review each claim individually, identifying the specific assertions made.
  3. Evaluate the provided evidence for each claim, assessing its quality and relevance.
  4. Compare each claim against the regulatory requirements for the specified region, noting any potential non-compliance.
  5. Provide a detailed report with a verdict for each claim and recommendations for revision or removal if needed.

Output format Present a structured report with sections: Claim-by-Claim Analysis, Evidence Assessment, Regulatory Compliance, and Recommended Actions. Use a table to summarize each claim's status, and maintain a professional, objective tone.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent evidence; base conclusions solely on provided data and known regulations.
  • Flag any assumptions about the evidence or regulations.
  • Stay within the scope of claims substantiation; do not provide unrelated legal advice.

Example

  • {{product_name}}: "Brain Boost Supplement"
  • {{claims}}: ["Boosts brain function", "Improves memory"]
  • {{evidence}}: "A 2022 study on 50 adults."
  • {{regulatory_region}}: "EU"

Follow-up prompts

  • What steps should I take if substantiation is insufficient?
  • How can I communicate necessary revisions to stakeholders effectively?
  • What resources can help gather scientific evidence for claims?