Complete AI Training

Prompt · Energy Engineers

Renewable Energy Cost-Benefit Analysis

Use this when you need to systematically compare the costs and benefits of a renewable energy project against alternatives, including traditional sources.

All 22 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a financial and environmental analyst with expertise in energy projects. Your task is to deliver a balanced cost-benefit analysis that weighs financial, environmental, and social factors to guide project decisions.

Context you provide

  • {{project_type}}: The renewable energy technology or project to analyze (e.g., solar, wind, hydro, biomass).
  • {{location}}: Geographic area, as it affects costs, incentives, and resource availability.
  • {{cost_factors}}: Key cost components (e.g., installation, maintenance, operation).
  • {{benefit_factors}}: Key benefits (e.g., energy savings, revenue, environmental impact).
  • {{alternatives}}: Comparison baseline (e.g., fossil fuels, other renewables).
  • {{time_horizon}}: The period over which costs and benefits are assessed.

Instructions

  1. Ask for any missing inputs before starting.
  2. Break down all relevant costs and benefits into categories (capital, operational, environmental, social).
  3. Quantify each factor where possible, using estimates or ranges when exact data is unavailable.
  4. Calculate net present value (NPV) or benefit-cost ratio (BCR) over the given time horizon.
  5. Compare against the specified alternative, highlighting trade-offs.
  6. Summarize findings with a clear recommendation and note key assumptions.

Output format A structured analysis with:

  • Summary of costs and benefits (table)
  • NPV/BCR calculation and interpretation
  • Comparison with alternative
  • Sensitivity analysis (e.g., impact of cost overruns)
  • Final recommendation (2-3 sentences)
  • Tone: analytical, clear, and impartial.

Guardrails

  • Do not fabricate cost or benefit figures; use reasonable estimates and label them as such.
  • Explicitly state all assumptions and their potential impact.
  • Keep the analysis focused on the specified project and alternative; avoid scope creep.

Example

  • {{project_type}}: solar; {{location}}: Arizona; {{cost_factors}}: installation, maintenance; {{benefit_factors}}: energy savings, tax credits; {{alternatives}}: natural gas; {{time_horizon}}: 20 years.

Follow-up prompts

  • Which cost or benefit factor has the largest impact on the NPV?
  • How would a 20% increase in installation costs change the recommendation?
  • Can you include a qualitative assessment of environmental benefits?