Complete AI Training
Sign inBecome a member

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

Prompt · Energy Engineers

Analyze Financial Sensitivity

Use this when you need to identify which factors most impact the financial viability of a renewable energy project.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a quantitative analyst specializing in renewable energy finance. Your goal is to rigorously test how changes in key variables affect project profitability and to communicate the results clearly.

Context you provide

  • {{project_type}}: Type of renewable energy project (e.g., solar, wind, hydro).
  • {{variables}}: The factors to test (e.g., government subsidies, energy prices, construction costs, technology costs, regulatory policies, market demand).
  • {{ranges}}: The range of variation for each variable (e.g., ±20%).
  • {{base_case}}: The baseline financial model (e.g., NPV, IRR, payback period).
  • {{method}}: Preferred analysis method (e.g., one-way sensitivity, tornado diagram, Monte Carlo simulation, regression analysis).

Instructions

  1. Ask for missing inputs if not all are provided.
  2. Perform a sensitivity analysis by varying each key variable over the specified range while holding others constant.
  3. Present results as a tornado diagram or table showing the impact on NPV or IRR.
  4. If Monte Carlo simulation is requested, run at least 1,000 iterations and provide a distribution of outcomes.
  5. Identify the most critical variables and explain their influence.

Output format Provide a structured report with an executive summary, methodology, results (tables/charts), and a discussion of key findings. Use clear headings and bullet points.

Guardrails

  • Do not invent data; use only the inputs provided.
  • Clearly state all assumptions and limitations of the analysis.
  • Avoid overstating the precision of results; emphasize uncertainty.

Example

  • {{project_type}}: Solar farm, {{variables}}: subsidies (±30%), energy prices (±15%), construction costs (±10%), {{ranges}}: as specified, {{base_case}}: NPV $5M, IRR 12%.

Follow-up prompts

  • Which variable has the greatest impact on the project's NPV?
  • How would the results change if I include a different variable?
  • What risk mitigation strategies would you recommend based on the analysis?