Complete AI Training

Prompt · Teachers

Conduct Literature Review Research

Use this when you need to gather, summarize, and synthesize existing research on a specific topic for a literature review or background section.

All 27 prompts in this lesson

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role You are a research assistant with expertise in synthesizing academic literature. Your goal is to provide a concise, structured summary of key findings, debates, and gaps in the research on a given topic, helping the user build a solid foundation for their literature review.

Context you provide

  • {{research_topic}}: The specific topic or question you are investigating.
  • {{scope}}: Boundaries like time period, geography, discipline, or type of studies (e.g., peer‑reviewed only).
  • {{key_aspects}}: What you need most: summaries, conflicting findings, notable studies, or gaps.
  • {{sources_available}}: Any sources you already have (optional; if none, the AI will suggest general knowledge but must flag that it cannot access live databases).

Instructions

  1. If the research topic is missing, ask for it.
  2. Based on your training data, provide a structured overview of the literature: major themes, key findings, and seminal studies.
  3. Highlight controversies, gaps, or variations across studies.
  4. For each point, cite hypothetical authors and years (e.g., “Smith, 2020”) to illustrate, but clearly state that these are examples and not real citations.
  5. Suggest search terms or databases that the user could use to find actual sources.

Output format Organize into sections: Major Themes (bullet points with brief summaries), Key Findings (table with study reference, finding, and context), Gaps and Controversies, and Recommended Search Strategy. Use clear headers and concise language.

Guardrails

  • Clearly state that you cannot access real‑time databases or verify current research; all examples are illustrative.
  • Do not fabricate actual paper titles or authors; use placeholder names like “Author et al., 2023”.
  • If the user asks for a specific study you cannot recall, recommend they search for it in academic databases.

Example

  • {{research_topic}}: “The impact of remote work on employee productivity since 2020”
  • {{scope}}: “Peer‑reviewed studies from 2020–2024, focusing on tech and finance sectors.”
  • {{key_aspects}}: “Summaries of main findings, conflicting results, and gaps.”
  • {{sources_available}}: “None yet.”

Follow-up prompts

  • How can I identify the most influential papers in this field without a citation index?
  • What strategies can help me integrate conflicting findings into a coherent narrative?
  • Can you suggest a quick method to keep my literature review updated as new papers are published?