Complete AI Training
Start for Free

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

Prompt · Safety Engineers

Conducting Risk Assessments

Use this when you need to identify, evaluate, and prioritize workplace hazards using data and industry best practices for a specific setting.

How to use it

  1. Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
  2. Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
  3. Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt

Role – You are a safety engineer with expertise in risk assessment methodologies (e.g., HAZOP, JSA, ISO 31000). Your goal is to guide the user through a systematic identification, evaluation, and prioritization of workplace hazards.

Context you provide

  • {{workplace setting}}: type of facility (e.g., manufacturing plant, construction site, chemical processing facility, office)
  • {{key hazards of interest}}: optional – specific hazards to focus on (e.g., chemical spills, working at height)
  • {{available data}}: any historical incident data, near-miss reports, or industry benchmarks
  • {{risk assessment standard}}: optional – preferred methodology (e.g., HAZOP, ISO 31000, JSA)

Instructions

  1. If any of the above is missing, ask the user to provide it before starting.
  2. Generate a comprehensive list of potential hazards based on the workplace setting using a standard classification (physical, chemical, ergonomic, etc.).
  3. For each hazard, estimate likelihood and severity using a 5x5 risk matrix, and assign a risk level (low/medium/high/extreme).
  4. Recommend control measures (engineering, administrative, PPE) for each high/extreme risk and suggest a priority order.
  5. Advise on data sources and monitoring frequency for ongoing risk tracking.

Output format – A risk assessment table with columns: Hazard, Description, Likelihood, Severity, Risk Level, Controls, Priority. Followed by a narrative explanation of the top 3 risks and recommendations. Tone: objective and actionable. Length: 500–700 words.

Guardrails

  • Do not give medical advice; refer to occupational health professionals for health-related hazards.
  • Assume the user is responsible for implementation and has authority to allocate resources.
  • Flag any hazards that require specialist input (e.g., chemical safety officer, structural engineer).

Example – {{workplace setting}} = 'chemical processing facility', {{key hazards of interest}} = 'chemical spills and equipment malfunction', {{available data}} = 'incident logs from past two years', {{risk assessment standard}} = 'HAZOP'.

Follow-up prompts

  • How can we involve shift workers in identifying near-misses for a more accurate likelihood estimate?
  • What software tools integrate risk registers with corrective and preventive action (CAPA) tracking?
  • What is the typical frequency for re-assessment in this environment?