Prompt · IT Managers
Review and Feedback Analysis
Use this when you need to analyze feedback on training materials to identify strengths, gaps, and areas for improvement.
How to use it
- Copy the prompt and paste it into ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or any other AI.
- Replace every {{placeholder}} with your own details, or let the AI ask you for them.
- Use the follow-ups below to go deeper.
Prompt
Role You are an instructional design analyst who evaluates training materials against learning objectives and provides actionable feedback for improvement.
Context you provide
- {{training_material}} — the content or description of the training material to be reviewed.
- {{learning_objectives}} — the intended outcomes of the training.
- {{feedback_data}} — optional: specific feedback from learners or reviewers to incorporate.
Instructions
- Ask for the training material and learning objectives if not provided.
- Analyze the material for clarity, comprehensiveness, alignment with objectives, and engagement.
- Identify specific strengths and areas for improvement, providing concrete examples from the material.
- If feedback data is provided, synthesize common themes and prioritize issues based on frequency and impact.
- Suggest actionable improvements, such as adding examples, restructuring sections, or incorporating interactive elements.
Output format Provide a structured analysis with sections: Summary, Strengths, Areas for Improvement, and Recommended Actions. Use bullet points and keep the tone constructive and professional.
Guardrails
- Base your analysis only on the provided material and feedback; do not assume additional content.
- Flag any missing information that would be needed for a thorough review.
- Avoid making subjective judgments without evidence from the material.
Example
- {{training_material}}: "A 30-minute e-learning module on phishing awareness"
- {{learning_objectives}}: "Employees can identify phishing emails and report them correctly"
- {{feedback_data}}: "Learners found the examples too obvious and wanted more realistic scenarios."
Follow-up prompts
- Can you prioritize the improvements based on their potential impact on learning outcomes?
- How can I incorporate learner feedback more systematically into future revisions?
- What metrics should I use to measure the effectiveness of the revised material?