Complete AI Training
Sign inGet my AI kit

Your job's AI kit

Get your AI kit

Tell us who you are and what you do. We show you your kit right away and email you the link: skills, prompts, AI agents, MCP servers and courses for your job.

500+ jobs ready, and we make a kit for any other job. No payment needed to look.

Share

AI agent for grant writers

Declined Proposal Resubmission Agent

A resubmission that answers every reviewer concern under the current rules

Declined Proposal Resubmission Agent: what goes in, what the agent does and what you get

What it does

A declined proposal often comes with reviewer comments or scores that point straight at the fix, but they are easy to skim and forget. This agent gathers the decline letter, reviewer comments, scores and notes from any debrief call. It maps each comment to a proposal section and groups comments that say the same thing. It checks the funder's guidelines for the next cycle, since rules and priorities change, and flags anything that affects eligibility. It drafts a revision plan ranked by how often an issue came up and how much it likely cost in scoring. The grant writer approves the plan. After revising, the agent checks every comment against the new draft. Open comments are listed with the sections still unchanged. The writer decides whether to resubmit. Edge case: with no feedback given, it drafts a polite debrief request.

How it works

Follow the arrows from top to bottom. The orange dashed arrow is the loop: when a check fails, the agent goes back and tries again.

Start and resultWhat it doesA check on its own workWaits for your OKGoes back and retries
ApprovedYes, continueNo 1 STARTS WHEN Decline notice arrives 2 USES A TOOL Collect reviewer comments, scores and notes 3 DOES Map comments to sections and group duplicates 4 USES A TOOL Check next cycle guidelines for changes 5 DOES Draft a ranked revision plan 6 YOU APPROVE Grant writer approves the plan 7 CHECKS THE RESULT Does the revised proposal address every comment? If not: list open comments and sections still unchanged.Back to step 3. 8 RESULT Revised proposal ready for the next cycle
Read the steps as a list
  1. Decline notice arrives
  2. Collect reviewer comments, scores and notes
  3. Map comments to sections and group duplicates
  4. Check next cycle guidelines for changes
  5. Draft a ranked revision plan
  6. Grant writer approves the planThe agent waits here for your OK.
  7. Does the revised proposal address every comment?If not: list open comments and sections still unchanged. Back to step 3.
  8. Revised proposal ready for the next cycle

How it decides

It ranks issues by how often reviewers raised them and the score of the criterion they relate to.

  • Rank issues by frequency and criterion score
  • Request a debrief when no feedback is given
  • Flag guideline changes that affect eligibility

Make it yours

Every agent is a starting point. You choose these settings for your own situation.

  • Revision plan format
  • Buffer before next deadline (default 4 weeks)
  • Debrief request template
  • Whether to include past scores

What keeps you in control

It always asks you first

  • Requesting a debrief
  • Resubmitting

Hard limits

  • Never contacts the funder without approval

It stops when

  • Done: revised proposal ready
  • Stop: funder has closed the program; tell the writer

Set it up

We guide you through the set-up, step by step

Members get the full set-up guide for this agent. No technical skills needed: you copy, paste and upload.

10 minto set it up in your AI
5 AIsChatGPT, Claude, Copilot, Gemini, Grok
  • One set of instructions to paste into your AI, with the clicks for ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft 365 Copilot, Gemini and Grok
  • The agent then walks you through connecting your own data, one source at a time
  • A downloadable copy with the flow chart, the rules and the full guide
Get access to this agent

An example run

What happensA youth arts proposal was declined on May 20. Three reviewers scored the evaluation plan lowest, and six of nine comments were about evaluation. The agent also found the next cycle capped requests at $75,000, down from $90,000. The writer approved the plan. After revising, the check found one comment about the timeline still open. The writer fixed it, and the recheck passed.

More agents for grant writers