LLM Stats

LLM Stats: a community-first leaderboard that compares language models by benchmarks, cost, and task-specific performance. Open, reproducible results and semi-private leaderboards to help makers pick the best model faster.

LLM Stats

About LLM Stats

LLM Stats is a comparison tool for large language models that aggregates benchmarks, pricing, and capability information in one place. It provides a playground and an API so users can test prompts and compare results across hundreds of models.

Review

LLM Stats positions itself as a community-first leaderboard for evaluating models by performance, cost and specific task scores like coding or long-context understanding. The interface focuses on side-by-side comparisons and practical metrics such as cost per 1k tokens, which makes it straightforward to judge trade-offs between price and quality.

Key Features

  • Model comparison dashboard showing benchmarks, cost, and capability summaries.
  • Interactive playground for running prompts against multiple models and observing differences.
  • API access to hundreds of models, enabling automated comparisons and integrations.
  • Leaderboards and community-driven benchmarking with an emphasis on transparent, reproducible evaluations.
  • Cost metrics (e.g., cost per 1k tokens) alongside task-specific scores like coding and long-context performance.

Pricing and Value

The listing indicates a free tier at launch, which provides immediate value for developers and researchers who want to compare models without upfront cost. The combination of benchmark data and cost metrics delivers a clear value proposition for teams evaluating trade-offs between performance and expense. Organizations that need high-volume or private benchmarking may expect paid tiers or enterprise plans for higher quotas and private environments.

Pros

  • Consolidates benchmarks and pricing into a single place, reducing time spent researching models.
  • Playground plus API makes it easy to test custom prompts and automate comparisons.
  • Access to many models at once enables broad apples-to-apples evaluations.
  • Community-driven approach and reproducible benchmark goals improve transparency.
  • Practical cost metrics (like cost per 1k tokens) help with real-world budgeting decisions.

Cons

  • Keeping benchmark data fresh is resource-intensive, so update cadence may vary and affect decision-making.
  • Some advanced visualizations and UX polish are still maturing and may be improved over time.
  • Users with strict privacy or heavy custom evaluation needs may need dedicated, private infrastructure beyond what a public leaderboard offers.

LLM Stats is well suited for developers, product teams, and researchers who need a quick, evidence-based way to compare models by cost and capability. It is most useful for people making selection decisions or running lightweight experiments; teams that require frequent, large-scale private evaluations should plan for additional tooling or enterprise options.



Open 'LLM Stats' Website
Get Daily AI Tools Updates

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)

Join thousands of clients on the #1 AI Learning Platform

Explore just a few of the organizations that trust Complete AI Training to future-proof their teams.