AI app for sales · no coding needed
Tender pursuit cost learning ledger
Improve visibility into the true cost of competitive bids.
Made for: Sales operations teams managing proposal-intensive tenders

What it does for you
The problem
Bid teams record wins but fail to learn which pursuit activities consume disproportionate effort.
What it gives you
Sales-leader-reviewed pursuit economics and estimation guide
What you give it
Consented time summariestender scopeexternal bid costsrecorded outcomes
How it works, step by step
- Classify pursuit work by stage
- Compare actual effort with original estimates
- Model bounded bid-resource scenarios
- Compare the reviewed result with the recorded baseline and value assumptions
- Capture corrections and named-owner approval before consequential use
- Export a versioned sales-leader-reviewed pursuit economics and estimation guide with source references and unresolved questions
Build it yourself with your AI system
Build this app yourself, no coding needed
Start with a quick version you can try in a few minutes. Like it? Then build the full app by copying and pasting our step-by-step instructions: everything is prepared for you.
Sign in to see how to build it yourself
Build a quick version to try, or get the full app pack for Tender pursuit cost learning ledger with the step-by-step building instructions. You don't need any technical skills: you copy, paste and answer a few questions. Both are included in the membership.
4 Have it built for you days to a few weeks
Rather not do it yourself, or want it fully tailored to your data, your way of working and your brand? Nexibeo builds Tender pursuit cost learning ledger with you.
What's in the app pack
Included in the Complete AI Training membership.
- The building instructions your AI follows, step by step
- The questions your AI will ask you about your business before it starts
- A clickable demo you can open in your browser, to see how it should work
- A detailed blueprint of the screens, the information it keeps and the checks it runs
Become a member to get the app packAlready a member? Sign in
The files, for the technically curious
- START-HERE.mdHow to build it with your own AI (read first)3 KB
- README.mdOverview and links1 KB
- questions.mdQuestions to answer before you build3 KB
- prompt-cloudflare.mdThe full build prompt, hosted on Cloudflare29 KB
- prompt-vps.mdThe same build on your own server (Docker)29 KB
- spec.jsonData model, API, AI pipeline, acceptance criteria16 KB
- demo/index.htmlThe working demo on sample data199 KB
Questions
Do I need to know how to code?
No. You copy and paste the prompts on this page into ChatGPT or Claude, and the AI does the building. When it asks you something, you answer in your own words.
What does it cost?
The quick version, the app pack and the step-by-step instructions are for members: you pay the membership price, not a price per app (see the plans). Building the full app uses your own ChatGPT or Claude subscription. Putting it online is often cheap or no cost at the start, and your AI tells you before anything costs money.
How long does it take?
The quick version: about two minutes. The real app: an afternoon for a first version you can use, longer if you want every feature.
Can I change it to fit my business?
Yes. Tell your AI what to change in plain words, like “add a column for the price” or “use our logo and colours”. Or have Nexibeo build and customise it for you.
More detailsHow the AI works, safeguards and what to build first
Improve visibility into the true cost of competitive bids
Confirm the buyer's problem and scope, collect consented time summaries, tender scope, external bid costs and recorded outcomes, then follow this sequence: 1. Classify pursuit work by stage. 2. Compare actual effort with original estimates. 3. Model bounded bid-resource scenarios. Resolve uncertain cases with qualified reviewers, approve sales-leader-reviewed pursuit economics and estimation guide, and measure contribution from won work less all pursuit costs over comparable cohorts against a documented baseline.
How the AI works
Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. Descriptive decision support; no automatic bid rejection or invented competitor intelligence. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.
Safeguards
Keep product capabilities and commercial terms verified. Use authorized customer records and require review before outreach, promises or pricing exceptions. Descriptive decision support; no automatic bid rejection or invented competitor intelligence. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.
What to build first
Pilot scope: Descriptive decision support; no automatic bid rejection or invented competitor intelligence. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: classify pursuit work by stage; compare actual effort with original estimates. Support the third module with operator review: model bounded bid-resource scenarios. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.
What it can connect to
Approved sales collateral, CRM records and product or pricing information. Read-only business data exports, reporting databases and task trackers. Reconcile source totals before scheduling recurring data refreshes. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.
The screens in detail
Primary screens: Data and definitions, Pattern investigation, Action and value review. Open with a compact overview and filters for the relevant period or segment. Let users drill from each theme or metric into underlying records. Keep source definitions and missing-data notes near the result. Use an action panel to assign investigations and record what was learned. Make the task-specific outcome sales-leader-reviewed pursuit economics and estimation guide visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.





