Research feed curation and briefing workbench

Reduce time spent scanning while keeping every claim traceable to its source. For research leads, analysts and knowledge teams who must follow many sources without information overload, convert licensed feeds, saved searches, user interest profiles and feedback into a reviewed daily briefing linked to original sources. The benefit is a testable hypothesis, measured through relevant items surfaced per review hour and briefing items later confirmed useful; do not assume that AI output alone produces business value.

Confirm the buyer's problem and scope, collect licensed feeds, saved searches, user interest profiles and feedback, then follow this sequence: 1. Ingest articles and papers from many permitted sources. 2. Rank items against stated interests and past feedback. 3. Summarize long articles and papers into key points. 4. Group duplicate stories covering the same event. Resolve uncertain cases with qualified reviewers, approve a reviewed daily briefing linked to original sources, and measure relevant items surfaced per review hour and briefing items later confirmed useful against a documented baseline.

How the AI works

Use AI to interpret permitted inputs, suggest structured mappings and generate candidate outputs for the three stated task modules. Use deterministic code for arithmetic, schema validation, hard constraints and reproducible tests. Review source-linked explanations and uncertainty before accepting results. Summaries must stay traceable to the original item; final editorial judgment and interpretation remain human. A model suggestion is never a verified fact, professional decision or authorization to act.

Safeguards

Preserve source attribution, quotation accuracy and usage permissions. Named editors approve substantive changes and briefing scope. One topic area and a fixed source list; summaries and rankings remain reviewable and every item links to its original source. Keep all consequential actions under authorized human control and do not fabricate missing inputs, permissions, professional judgments or market evidence.

What to build first

Pilot scope: One topic area and a fixed source list; summaries and rankings remain reviewable and every item links to its original source. Implement one approved input format, a bounded representative case set and the first two task modules: ingest articles and papers from many permitted sources; rank items against stated interests and past feedback. Support the third module with operator review: summarize long articles and papers into key points. Include source references, corrections, basic organization access, approval states, export and value measurement. Use managed operator assistance for unresolved exceptions. The cost estimate covers this narrow prototype, not unrestricted multi-tenant scale, complex production integrations, specialist certification or physical operations.

What it can connect to

Publisher and repository feeds, saved searches, email digests and permitted research sources. Cloud storage, document import/export and briefing destinations. Start with file exchange and validate destination specifications before promising direct publishing. Start with authorized file exchange. Validate current provider access, usage rights and schema behavior before promising a connector.

The screens in detail

Primary screens: Interest and source setup, Reviewed briefing, Item detail and archive. Use a feed list for sources, a central briefing canvas grouped by topic, and a right-hand panel for summaries, annotations and source links. Let users compare duplicate stories side by side. Display draft, changes requested and approved states. Provide a shareable briefing link with comments anchored to the relevant item. Make the task-specific outcome a reviewed daily briefing linked to original sources visible beside its evidence, review state and value baseline.