Rising Government IT Budgets: What It Means For AI, Cybersecurity, and Gartner
More than half of government CIOs outside the US expect IT budgets to increase in 2026. The focus: cybersecurity, cloud platforms, and AI-generative AI included. Even with tight public finances, demand for credible technology guidance is holding up because leaders are chasing risk reduction and efficiency at the same time.
This shift has two angles. For public-sector teams, it's a chance to move stalled initiatives forward. For Gartner, it signals steady demand for advisory on AI and security-while the spread of low-cost AI tools still pressures traditional research subscriptions.
Why this matters to public-sector leaders
Budgets are rising, but scrutiny will be high. Every dollar needs a measurable outcome: fewer incidents, faster citizen service, lower unit costs, or shorter delivery cycles. Treat AI and cybersecurity spend as a portfolio and defend each line with metrics.
- Cybersecurity: accelerate identity-first controls, zero-trust rollouts, incident response tuning, and supply-chain risk checks. See the CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model.
- Cloud: standardize tagging, FinOps policy, backups, and cross-cloud guardrails to cut waste and audit risk.
- AI: start with narrow, high-volume use cases (ticket triage, summarization, content classification) and add model risk checks guided by the NIST AI Risk Management Framework.
- Data: classify sensitive data, set retention rules, and restrict training on regulated or citizen data.
- People: equip staff to evaluate AI tools, write effective prompts, and verify outputs with clear playbooks.
How this could shift Gartner's narrative
Gartner's value rests on ongoing demand for actionable tech insights. The survey points to healthy near-term demand from governments prioritizing cybersecurity, cloud, and AI. That supports the advisory pipeline-even as clients test cheaper AI answers that might pressure renewals over time.
One recent move: an $800 million senior notes offering, which gives Gartner more flexibility to fund operations, manage debt, and adapt its products to AI-era expectations. The current outlook points to roughly $7.4 billion in revenue and $821.8 million in earnings by 2028-about 4.7% annual revenue growth but down from ~$1.3 billion in earnings today. Some community fair value estimates cluster around the high-$200s to low-$400s per share, with one scenario at $284.27 implying roughly a low-20% upside from recent levels. Useful context, not a guarantee.
Practical steps to get real value from a 2026 budget
- Define three outcomes you will measure quarterly (e.g., mean time to detect, cost per citizen interaction, backlog burn-down).
- Write RFPs that require outcome metrics, AI safety controls (red-teaming, lineage, human review), and data residency terms.
- Pilot, then scale: 90-day pilots with go/no-go criteria tied to risk and ROI-not demos.
- Bake in zero-trust milestones and external validation (pen tests, tabletop exercises) for security awards.
- Demand vendor transparency on training data, model updates, and content provenance.
- Use shared platforms where possible to avoid tool sprawl and duplicative contracts.
- Stand up FinOps policies for cloud and AI inference costs; tag everything; report monthly.
- Set data-sharing agreements early for cross-agency work to avoid late legal blocks.
- Include performance rebates or extensions tied to real-world results, not activity.
- Fund workforce skills explicitly-AI literacy, prompt practice, security ops tuning. If you need structured options, explore role-based paths here: AI courses by job and popular certifications.
Questions public-sector CIOs and CISOs should ask vendors (including research providers)
- What measurable outcome will your guidance or product improve in 90 days, and how will we verify it?
- How do you keep your advice current as models and threats change, and can we see the update cadence?
- What's your policy on content provenance, copyrighted material, and synthetic data?
- Which public-sector controls do you meet today (e.g., FedRAMP/StateRAMP/ISO 27001), and what's on your roadmap?
- Show a cost comparison against AI assistants or open-source options for the same use case.
- If we pause or downgrade, how do we keep access to deliverables and evidence of impact?
Risks to watch as budgets rise
- Shadow AI: staff uploading sensitive data into public tools.
- Data sovereignty: unclear location or control of training and inference.
- Vendor lock-in: proprietary formats, closed pipelines, opaque models.
- Model drift and supply-chain exposure: degraded accuracy, poisoned components, weak third-party controls.
Bottom line
Higher government IT budgets create room to strengthen defenses and put AI to work where it actually saves time and money. Gartner stands to benefit from that demand, but the spread of low-cost AI tools keeps pressure on the traditional research model. Keep your spend tied to outcomes, require proof, and invest in people so your team can judge tools on their merits-not on hype.
This content is general information, not financial advice. It doesn't account for your objectives or financial situation, and it may not reflect recent company announcements.
Your membership also unlocks:
