Is your business ready for an agentic AI team?
Agentic AI is moving fast from hype to headcount. In a recent survey, 79% of executives said their companies are adopting AI agents - autonomous systems that complete tasks and make real-time decisions to deliver outcomes. Pair them with human oversight and you get scale, speed and a clearer path to ROI.
The question isn't "if," it's "how soon - and are you actually ready?" Below is a practical briefing and a readiness assessment you can use to decide.
What are agentic AI teams?
Think beyond task automation. Agentic AI handles entire workflows, hands work off between agents, and calls tools and data to reach an outcome. Humans lead, review, and step in where judgment or relationships matter.
By 2026, 40% of Global 2000 roles will involve working with AI agents, reshaping entry-, mid-, and senior-level positions. Early adopters report measurable productivity gains, and many are already expanding pilots to full programs.
Where agents fit today
Enterprises are customizing agents to match their operating reality. Airlines can auto-rebook customers and reroute bags so human staff can handle exceptions. Financial firms can capture meeting actions, send reminders, and track follow-through without manual chasing.
Leaders in claims management report that as agents become reliable across multistep workflows, they're prioritizing workflow reinvention - not just incremental tweaks - to support frontline teams and shorten cycle times.
PwC's AI Agent Survey and Deloitte's State of AI in the Enterprise both point to strong executive confidence, with most companies planning to customize agents for their unique needs.
The executive readiness assessment for agentic AI
Use the 10 areas below to assess your starting point. Aim for clear outcomes, then design the team (people + agents) to deliver them.
1) Strategy: outcomes before models
High performers have strategic clarity. They define the business outcome, the metric, and the time horizon - then back into models, tools, and workflows.
- Executive check: What outcome will an agent own end-to-end?
- Metric: How will we prove value monthly and quarterly?
- Guardrail: What's out of scope for agents (for now)?
2) Leadership: align narrative, priorities and funding
Executives and line leaders must understand what agents can do, where they fit, and how teams will work with them. Clear sponsorship reduces fear and speeds adoption.
- Who owns this program and the P&L impact?
- Have we set the expectation: human-in-the-loop by design?
- Do managers know how to measure agent performance?
3) Data: consistent, governed, and monitored
If your data is messy, agents will be unreliable. Only a minority of organizations have data mature enough to support agentic workflows without heavy cleanup.
- Is core data standardized, fresh, and accessible via APIs?
- Do we have data quality SLAs and continuous monitoring?
- Is governance documented and enforced at ingestion and use?
4) Process integration: automate outcomes, not bad workflows
Agents should map to clear processes with defined handoffs and exceptions. Document, standardize, then redesign - don't just bolt agents onto broken steps.
- Do we have current-state and future-state workflows?
- Where will agents make decisions, and where will humans decide?
- What is the exception path and who owns it?
5) Technology and architecture: modernize for agentic work
Legacy stacks slow you down. You'll need modern data architecture, secure tool access, and scalable environments to run agents reliably.
- Are services/API endpoints ready for agents to call safely?
- Do we have evaluation, testing, and rollback for agent changes?
- Is observability in place for latency, accuracy, and cost?
6) Orchestration: manage multistep workflows, not one-off tasks
Many failures come from optimizing isolated tasks. Agents must follow a clear sequence to deliver an outcome. Use an orchestration layer to coordinate agents, tools, and checkpoints.
- What triggers the workflow and what completes it?
- How do agents pass context and state across steps?
- Where are the human review gates?
7) Change readiness: prepare people for new ways of working
Adoption ranges from eager to resistant. Build AI fluency, show quick wins, and involve the frontline in redesign to drive trust and usage.
- Do we have a communication plan beyond a single town hall?
- Are incentives aligned to outcomes achieved with agents?
- Can employees provide feedback and influence iterations?
8) Governance and risk control: autonomy needs guardrails
As autonomy rises, so does risk. Establish policies on what agents can do, secure access to data and tools, and log decisions for auditability.
- Policy: permissions, data boundaries, escalation rules
- Controls: identity, approvals, rate limits, red-teaming
- Proof: audit trails, lineage, and explainability by default
9) Skills: blend business context with AI engineering
You'll need leaders who own outcomes, operators who run workflows, and technologists who can deploy and refine agents close to the business. Forward-deployed engineers are especially valuable.
- Do we have product owners for agentic workflows?
- Who handles prompt, tool, and policy updates week to week?
- What's our upskilling plan for managers and frontline staff?
10) Cost management: measure value as you scale
Usage grows fast - and so do bills. Track costs at the workflow and outcome level, then keep or cut based on ROI, not excitement.
- Unit economics: cost per outcome, not per token
- FinOps: budgets, alerts, and optimization playbooks
- Stage gates: scale only after meeting value thresholds
Pros and cons executives should weigh
- Upside: Productivity, shorter cycle times, lower error rates in repetitive work, and better customer responsiveness.
- Downside: Faulty outcomes if data is weak or guardrails are missing, role disruption, and cost overruns without controls.
Set the "North Star" clearly: agents augment people and improve outcomes. Resist fear-of-missing-out deployments that skip design, governance, and change management.
A practical 30-60-90 plan
- Days 1-30: Pick one outcome. Map the workflow, define metrics, secure data access, and set policy guardrails. Choose a small pilot segment.
- Days 31-60: Build the agentic workflow with orchestration and human checkpoints. Track accuracy, latency, exceptions, and cost. Iterate weekly.
- Days 61-90: Prove ROI on the pilot cohort. Standardize runbooks, dashboards, and controls. Plan phased rollout to the next segment.
Executive takeaway
Agentic AI teams pay off when you anchor them to outcomes, engineer the workflow, and lead the change. Start small, measure hard, scale what works - and keep humans in the loop where it matters most.
Your membership also unlocks:
