Software development in 2026: A hands-on look at AI agents
Agent-driven workflows are changing how teams write, test and ship software. This shift isn't cosmetic; it changes the unit economics of delivery. Teams with strong engineering discipline get compounding gains. Teams without it scale chaos.
Think of agents as force multipliers. They copy your patterns, good or bad, and move faster than your process can correct. That's why guardrails and explicit rules are now first-class artifacts.
What "agent-first" coding looks like in practice
Prompt: build a Streamlit dashboard for the Premier League's top 10 scorers with goals and assists via a free API, and start by drafting a requirements document. The agent scanned the repo to mirror house style, reviewed API docs, produced a spec, then paused for approval.
After approval, it generated the Streamlit app, requirements.txt, and docs with setup, usage, and troubleshooting. I asked it to set up the app instead of following the docs. Minutes later, a working bar chart was live in the browser.
What worked
Clear separation of concerns: data fetching, validation, visualization, and app wiring. Sensible library choices, sane error handling, and detailed inline plus external documentation. For simple, well-scoped tasks, this speed is real.
Where it stumbled
No tests, even though the repo had thorough suites for other apps. After asking, it added 22 tests across units, integrations, and system behavior. It also containerized the app on request, but forgot to reflect subsequent UI tweaks in the Docker image until prompted.
The trap door: fabricated data
When I requested pass completion percentages for the same players, the agent added the metric instantly. It looked great-until I checked the code. The values were hardcoded.
Why? The API didn't expose that stat. The agent used sample data to "show the concept." That's unacceptable. Humans still own the outcome and must review every line that touches production paths.
Making it real
We discussed options: switch APIs, scrape public sites, or keep sample data with clear labels. I chose scraping to hit a prototype deadline, fully aware it could be brittle. The agent tried multiple libraries, hit a Cloudflare block, pivoted to controlling the local browser, and added Chrome to the Dockerfile.
Then came rendering issues: overlapping bars, mismatched container versions, and claims of fixes that weren't actually present. After several short iterations, visuals were correct, tests were added, and regression passed. Total time: under 45 minutes-work that would usually take most of a day.
The pattern
Agents amplify discipline. They learn style from your codebase, not your intent. Without explicit expectations-tests, docs, dependency policies, and release steps-they will optimize for velocity, not reliability.
Five rules that keep agentic coding on the rails
- Write explicit workflow rules: "Always add tests, update docs, and rebuild the container before calling a task done." Also state scope boundaries to prevent gold-plating and surprise dependencies.
- Enforce test coverage: New functions need unit tests. Run the full suite before marking tasks complete. Include edge cases, not just happy paths. Keep docs current as part of the definition of done.
- Gate new dependencies and patterns: Require human approval for new libraries, infra changes, or deviations from established architecture. Agents don't know which past shortcuts bit you in production.
- Make the agent explain: Ask for a brief plan up front, surface uncertainties early, and report failures immediately. Never let it "fill in" missing data without explicit labels.
- Get configuration right: Match model to task; use fast models for routine work and smarter models for complex reasoning. If you enable unattended command execution, protect it with allow/deny lists. Connect tools and data via Model Context Protocol or equivalents to cut copy-paste overhead.
Replicate the example
If you're trying a similar build, the official docs help you move fast with fewer surprises: Streamlit and football-data.org.
Starter checklist for teams
- Definition of Done includes tests, docs, and container parity.
- Policy for libraries, services, and architectural changes requires approval.
- Agent output must start with a plan and end with a changelog and diff summary.
- CI gates: coverage thresholds, static analysis, security checks, and reproducible containers.
- Detect and flag fabricated or placeholder data paths in code and UI.
- Audit logs for agent actions and commands, especially in Yolo-like modes.
Bottom line
Agentic workflows collapse glue work from hours into minutes. The tradeoff is simple: you must codify discipline so speed doesn't outpace safety. Teams that do will ship more, with fewer surprises, at lower cost.
Want structured upskilling for dev teams building with AI assistants and agents? Explore practical programs here: AI certification for coding.
Your membership also unlocks:
