AI Legal Battles Heat Up: UK Trial and New U.S. Lawsuit
Two significant legal disputes are unfolding that highlight the tension between generative AI providers and content owners accusing these companies of unauthorized use of copyrighted materials.
On June 9, the British High Court began hearing arguments in a case where Getty Images accuses Stability AI of copyright infringement. Getty claims Stability AI used its vast photography collection without permission to train the Stable Diffusion image-generation model.
This UK trial follows closely after Reddit filed a lawsuit against Anthropic in the U.S. on June 4. Reddit alleges breach of contract, accusing Anthropic of scraping user data from its platform to train AI models without consent.
Reddit vs. Anthropic: A Contract Law Dispute
Reddit’s lawsuit centers on contract law rather than copyright. Reddit insists that Anthropic violated its terms of use, which explicitly prohibit unauthorized data scraping for AI training. Other AI vendors like OpenAI and Google do use Reddit content but under licensing agreements.
Michael G Bennett, a data science and AI strategy expert, explains that this case boils down to enforcing website terms of use. The court will likely focus heavily on the contractual language users agree to when accessing Reddit.
Reddit’s position also reflects a broader business strategy. It aims to negotiate licensing deals with AI companies rather than allow unauthorized use of its content. Allowing unlicensed data scraping threatens Reddit’s business model and undermines its ability to monetize its platform.
Getty Images vs. Stability AI: Copyright Infringement in Focus
Getty Images’ lawsuit against Stability AI raises copyright infringement issues. Getty argues that AI companies should compensate content creators when their works are used to train AI models.
Stability AI defends itself by claiming its use of Getty’s images falls under fair use. However, fair use laws differ significantly between the UK and the U.S., suggesting the outcomes of these cases may diverge.
Vincent Allen, an intellectual property lawyer, notes that the UK court might rule strictly against Stability AI, finding copyright infringement without exceptions. In contrast, U.S. courts have more flexible interpretations of fair use, potentially leading to different results.
The UK case will be decided by a judge, while the U.S. case involving Reddit and Anthropic could be jury-decided. Although the UK decision might influence U.S. proceedings, both will likely follow independent legal reasoning.
Regardless of rulings, both cases are expected to lead to lengthy appeals processes. The ultimate resolution may rest with the U.S. Supreme Court or new legislation clarifying fair use in AI training contexts.
What These Cases Mean for Legal Professionals
- Contract enforcement: The Reddit vs. Anthropic case underscores the importance of clear terms of use and licensing agreements for online content.
- Copyright challenges: Getty vs. Stability highlights the growing legal scrutiny over AI’s use of copyrighted material, with implications for content owners and AI developers worldwide.
- Jurisdictional differences: Varying copyright laws between countries mean legal strategies must consider local nuances, especially regarding fair use.
- Long-term impact: These lawsuits may set precedents affecting AI training practices and content licensing models for years.
Legal professionals should monitor these cases closely. They represent key tests of how copyright and contract law intersect with emerging AI technologies.
For practitioners interested in AI law and related training, resources like Complete AI Training’s courses for legal professionals offer practical insights into these evolving issues.
Your membership also unlocks:
