AI Decision Support System Reduces Recurrent Stroke Events in Major Chinese Trial

An AI clinical decision support system reduced recurrent vascular events after acute ischemic stroke in a large Chinese trial. It improved care quality and lowered mortality over 12 months.

Categorized in: AI News Healthcare Management
Published on: May 31, 2025
AI Decision Support System Reduces Recurrent Stroke Events in Major Chinese Trial

AI Tool Linked to Fewer Recurrent Events After Stroke

An artificial intelligence (AI)–based clinical decision support system has shown promising results in improving acute ischemic stroke treatment. A recent randomized trial involving over 20,000 patients in China found that this AI tool helped reduce recurrent vascular events significantly compared to usual care.

The AI system combines clinician input with hospital records and imaging data to guide patient management, focusing on stroke cause and secondary prevention. This approach aims to support doctors in making quicker, evidence-based decisions during critical moments of stroke care.

Trial Overview and Key Results

The GOLDEN BRIDGE II trial, conducted from January 2021 to June 2023 across 77 hospitals in China, tested the AI system’s effectiveness. Hospitals were randomly assigned to either implement the AI tool or continue standard care. The AI provided automated MRI lesion detection, stroke subtype classification, and guideline-based treatment recommendations in real time.

The study enrolled 21,603 patients (median age 67, 35% women) with acute ischemic stroke, with 96% completing a 12-month follow-up. The main measure was the occurrence of new vascular events—such as ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, heart attack, or vascular death—at 3 months post-stroke.

Results showed a clear benefit for the AI-supported care group:

  • Recurrent vascular events at 3 months: 2.9% (AI group) vs 3.9% (control), adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.71, P < .001
  • At 6 months: 3.4% vs 4.8%, aHR 0.70, P < .001
  • At 12 months: 4.0% vs 5.5%, aHR 0.70, P < .001

The AI tool was also linked to lower all-cause mortality at 6 months (2.0% vs 2.3%; aHR 0.78, P = .007) and 12 months (3.0% vs 3.5%; aHR 0.77, P < .001). Additionally, hospitals using the AI system achieved higher quality scores for acute ischemic stroke care.

Expert Perspectives and Considerations

While the trial provides strong evidence for AI’s potential in stroke management, experts urge caution before adopting this technology broadly. The study was based on Chinese stroke guidelines, which differ from those used in Europe and the US. Replicating the trial in Western healthcare settings is necessary to confirm if similar benefits occur with other clinical protocols.

Some neurologists pointed out that the trial doesn’t clarify the exact mechanisms behind the improved outcomes. Whether the AI’s impact came from better imaging analysis, improved guideline adherence, or more precise stroke subtype classification remains unclear. More detailed data would help target further improvements.

Another concern is the cluster randomized design, which allows for variations in care quality between hospitals. Despite this, the large scale and real-world setting of the study strengthen its findings.

Challenges to Clinical Integration

Experts also highlighted practical challenges in integrating AI tools into daily clinical workflows. Maintaining and updating AI algorithms to keep pace with evolving medical knowledge is a key obstacle. Unlike static clinical trials, real-time monitoring is needed to ensure AI recommendations remain accurate and safe as guidelines change.

There is also a need to ensure training data diversity to avoid amplifying biases inherent in AI models. Future AI developments may include interactive, real-time user feedback and reinforcement learning, which could enhance clinical utility.

What This Means for Healthcare Management

Healthcare leaders should watch the progress of AI clinical decision support systems closely. The GOLDEN BRIDGE II trial demonstrates that AI can contribute to improved patient outcomes, provided the technology is validated within local guideline frameworks and clinical environments.

Implementing AI tools successfully will require investment in infrastructure, clinician training, and ongoing performance evaluation. For managers interested in AI applications in healthcare, exploring courses on AI implementation and management can provide valuable insights. Resources like Complete AI Training’s healthcare management courses offer practical guidance on integrating AI in clinical settings.

As AI continues to evolve, its role in stroke care and beyond will depend on rigorous validation, transparent reporting, and adaptable clinical workflows that prioritize patient safety and outcomes.