AI-Generated Music Ignites Debate in the Music Industry
Bands like The Velvet Sundown and TaTa, created entirely with artificial intelligence, are stirring significant controversy in the music scene. The debate has intensified recently as Spotify reportedly published AI-generated songs under the profiles of deceased artists.
The Blaze Foley Case
Blaze Foley, a country singer-songwriter who was killed nearly 40 years ago, had a new song appear on his Spotify page titled "Together." This track, which has since been removed, featured typical elements of Foley’s music style—a male country voice, piano, and electric guitar. Despite these familiar traits, the song was AI-generated.
Spotify pulled the song for violating its deceptive content policies. The platform’s rules prohibit impersonation intended to mislead, including replicating an artist’s name, image, or description falsely. The song page also displayed an AI-generated image of a man singing, which didn’t resemble Foley.
Craig McDonald, owner of Lost Art Records (Foley’s label), criticized the song: "It’s kind of an AI schlock bot. It has nothing to do with the Blaze you know." His comment highlights concerns about authenticity and respect for artistic legacy.
Other Affected Artists and Spotify’s Response
Blaze Foley is not alone. AI-generated music attributed to Grammy-winning country artist Guy Clark, who passed away a decade ago, also appeared on Spotify. Similar to Foley’s case, the profile used an AI-generated image that did not look like Clark.
Spotify stated it will "take action against licensors and distributors who fail to police for this kind of fraud," including permanent removal for repeated or severe violations. This shows the platform’s commitment to addressing fraudulent content but also raises questions about detection and prevention mechanisms.
Community Reactions and Calls for Transparency
Some music fans applaud Spotify’s prompt removal of AI-generated songs. However, others feel the company isn’t acting fast enough. On Reddit, listeners reported encountering multiple AI-generated tracks in their personalized playlists, fueling calls for better controls.
Many users want Spotify to introduce a clear label for AI-generated music. Currently, no such tag exists, leaving listeners unaware if a song or artist profile is human-made or algorithm-produced. Spotify has yet to clarify its plans on this front.
Industry and Legal Perspectives
Streaming platforms like Spotify have no legal obligation to disclose AI involvement in music creation, but industry groups urge governments to impose transparency rules. Sophie Jones from the British Phonographic Industry emphasized the need for clear labeling and proper copyright enforcement to protect artists and inform fans.
These developments reveal a growing tension between AI creativity and traditional music rights, leaving both musicians and listeners uncertain about the future of music authenticity.
What Creatives Should Keep in Mind
- AI tools can produce music that mimics existing artists but may lack genuine artistry and emotional depth.
- Platforms are still figuring out how to police AI-generated content, which means creators should stay informed about evolving policies.
- Transparency about AI usage in music is becoming a key concern—being upfront with your audience can build trust.
If you’re interested in expanding your skills with AI in creative fields, explore practical courses and resources at Complete AI Training to stay ahead of industry changes.
Your membership also unlocks:
