AI videos, mass protests, and official accounts: What government professionals need to do now
As "No Kings" protests spread across all 50 states, President Donald Trump shared an AI-generated video on social media depicting himself wearing a crown in a "KING TRUMP" fighter jet and dumping brown liquid over demonstrators to the soundtrack of "Danger Zone." The clip appeared on both his personal and official accounts, drawing immediate criticism and concern about tone and intent.
Organizers say nearly 7 million people participated nationwide. The administration and its allies responded with derision and additional AI content, escalating an information fight alongside the street-level demonstrations.
What happened
After a day golfing, Trump posted an AI video that portrays him bombing a crowd of No Kings protesters with brown liquid while flying a branded jet. The piece riffs on Top Gun imagery and was amplified across official channels.
Senior Republicans joined the push. The Speaker of the House labeled the events "Hate America" rallies. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy suggested participants are pro-Hamas or paid actors tied to Antifa; critics note there is no formal federal process to designate domestic groups as terrorist organizations. Vice President JD Vance shared another AI video showing Trump donning a crown and cape as Democratic leaders kneel.
Scale and stakes
Protest organizers describe this as the largest single-day protest in modern U.S. history. Critics of the White House argue the AI content is meant to provoke unrest that could justify invoking the Insurrection Act and further militarize local law enforcement.
This is part of a pattern. In September, the president posted an AI image of himself in military gear over a flaming Chicago skyline with the slogan "Chipocalypse Now," signaling a willingness to use stylized, militarized imagery during domestic crises.
Why this matters for public officials
AI-generated political content posted from official accounts blurs lines between satire, policy signaling, and operational intent. It can inflame tensions, confuse chain-of-command messaging, and complicate public safety operations.
For agencies at every level, the risk is practical: public order, misinformation, records compliance, and the potential for misinterpretation that escalates street conditions.
Immediate steps for agencies
- Reconfirm your social media policy: Clarify who can post on official accounts, what requires approval, and how to label AI-generated content.
- Stand up a rumor-control page: Publish verified information, protest routes, curfews, closures, and contacts. Update on a schedule.
- Synchronize messaging: Ensure city, state, and federal partners share consistent language on rights, restrictions, and safety guidance.
- Document everything: Treat official social posts as records. Archive content, approvals, and takedown rationales.
- De-escalation as default: Publicly commit to protecting peaceful assembly while clearly outlining unlawful conduct thresholds.
Operational planning for large protests
- Intelligence discipline: Distinguish between credible threats and online provocation. Avoid mission creep into protected speech monitoring.
- Incident command clarity: Define authority for dispersal orders, less-lethal use, and mutual aid activation ahead of time.
- Media lines: Prepare statements that condemn violence without broad-brushing peaceful crowds. Avoid language that implies collective guilt.
- Community liaisons: Maintain open lines with protest organizers and civil rights observers to reduce friction points.
- Officer conduct: Refresh guidance on recording in public, identification display, and restraint reporting.
Legal and compliance notes
- Official accounts are records: Follow federal and state records management rules; coordinate with counsel and records officers. See National Archives guidance on social media records: NARA resource.
- Insurrection Act context: Understand authorities, limits, and implications for military involvement in domestic operations. A plain-language primer: Lawfare overview.
- Hatch Act sensitivity: While the President is exempt, most executive branch employees are not. Keep partisan messaging off official time, systems, and channels.
- Content standards: Avoid demeaning or dehumanizing depictions in official communications; they raise risk of rights claims and public trust erosion.
Managing AI-generated political content
- Label AI media: If your agency uses synthetic media (for training or public education), disclose it clearly and avoid realistic depictions of violence.
- Set review gates: Route high-risk content (satire, crisis imagery, use-of-force references) through legal and leadership review before posting.
- Prepare counter-messaging: When provocative AI content spreads, respond with factual, neutral information about rights, routes, and services.
What to communicate today
- Affirm the right to peaceful assembly and the agency's role in keeping people safe.
- Share clear rules: street closures, protest zones, and prohibited items.
- Provide reporting channels for safety issues, misconduct, and medical aid.
- Publish how to verify official updates and where to find them.
Bottom line
AI-fueled political theater can pull agencies into narratives they don't control. Your defense is disciplined communications, lawful operations, and visible commitment to civil liberties.
Codify your social media governance, train teams on AI media risks, and keep the public informed with steady, neutral updates. That's how you lower the temperature while doing the job.
Resource for team upskilling
If your staff needs a fast upgrade on AI/media literacy for public communications, review these options: AI courses overview.
Your membership also unlocks:
