ALN's AI Math Coach Puts K-5 Teacher Expertise at the Center
Math scores are dragging and districts are stretched thin. With 32 percent of U.S. public schools unable to fill math teaching roles and federal relief funds winding down, the All Learners Network (ALN) is pushing a clear idea: fix teaching conditions, not just student outcomes.
ALN's new AI Math Coach focuses on planning, assessment, and instructional support for pre-K-5 educators. The tool is built by ALN math coaches and facilitators and prioritizes teacher expertise over student-facing interventions.
What the tool does
ALN describes AI Math Coach as research-based software that provides personalized, on-demand support to build both content knowledge and pedagogical skill. It's positioned as a way to extend human coaching, not replace it.
"We've been focused on the wrong side of the equation," ALN CEO John Tapper said. "Research proves the most powerful lever is teacher expertise, not student-facing interventions. High-quality coaching works but takes time and resources to scale - coaches spend two to three hours preparing for a single session. AI Math Coach solves that."
Key features
- Pedagogy Assistant: Helps teachers deepen conceptual understanding and plan instruction that prioritizes student reasoning over procedural steps. Teachers can ask for support on a specific lesson and get guidance aligned to how students at that age typically learn a concept.
- Intervention Assistant: Analyzes student work, surfaces likely misconceptions, and drafts targeted intervention plans using ALN's internal resources.
"We do not promote instruction where the teacher 'shows', 'demonstrates,' or 'models' math procedures," Tapper added. "This isn't about replacing human coaches or professional development. It's about extending their reach. Every teacher deserves access to high-quality support for their own learning."
Why this matters for school and district leaders
Coaching moves teacher practice, but it's slow and expensive to scale. If a tool can offload prep, surface misconceptions faster, and keep the focus on student reasoning, more teachers get consistent support without waiting for a coaching cycle.
This approach aligns with evidence that teacher coaching can improve instruction and achievement when implemented well. See national math trends for context and urgency: NAEP 2022 mathematics results.
How to pilot this semester
- Start small: Pick one grade level and one priority unit (e.g., multi-digit addition or fractions).
- Define use cases: Lesson planning support with the Pedagogy Assistant; quick-turn analysis of student exit tickets with the Intervention Assistant.
- Set guardrails: Establish norms for teacher judgment, data privacy, and documentation. AI drafts; teachers decide.
- Measure impact: Track changes in lesson quality (look-fors on reasoning), student work samples, and short common assessments.
- Embed in PLCs: Use outputs as starting points for discussion, not endpoints.
Questions to ask before scaling
- How does the tool store and protect student work? Can we opt out of data retention?
- What research base informs the pedagogy, and can we see examples aligned to our curriculum?
- How well does it identify common misconceptions across grades K-5?
- What training do teachers need to use it effectively within existing planning time?
- How will we monitor instructional shifts toward reasoning and representation, not just task completion?
For context and further reading
- Evidence on teacher coaching effectiveness: Meta-analysis by Kraft, Blazar, and Hogan (2018)
- Exploring AI upskilling for educators: AI courses by job
Bottom line: if your district is serious about improving math, invest where the leverage is. Give teachers faster access to high-quality planning and intervention support, keep human judgment in the loop, and track whether more students are explaining their thinking - not just getting answers.
Your membership also unlocks:
