AI and insurance: Why Canada's white-collar jobs may be next
AI didn't storm Canadian insurance offices. It slipped in through the tools we already use - claims intake, underwriting workbenches, document systems - and started taking the small, repeatable tasks off our desks.
That's good for efficiency. It's also a clear signal: the entry points into our industry are changing fast.
The calm before the restructuring
A major analysis published in Harvard Business Review reports that almost every role has some exposure to generative AI, with clerical and analytical work the most at risk. The researchers argue that this tech can lift productivity and help with demographic headwinds - while also squeezing the middle of the labour market.
In Canada, that matters. Since 2000, most job growth has been in office-based work - exactly where these tools are strongest.
The new front line of automation
For years, tech displaced physical tasks first. Generative AI flips that. It targets structured, repeatable, precision-heavy work - the daily routines that keep insurers moving.
Think data entry, compliance documentation, policy processing, risk review, and customer correspondence. None of these are edge cases. They're the core of operations.
The 10 Canadian roles most exposed in insurance and financial services
- Data entry and processing clerks
- Administrative and executive assistants
- Accounts and payroll clerks
- Customer service and call-centre agents
- Paralegals and legal clerks
- Market and business analysts
- Junior financial and investment analysts
- Technical writers and translators
- Basic-level programmers and testers
- Compliance, documentation and reporting specialists
These roles span carriers, brokerages, and financial firms across the country. Expect the mix of tasks - and team sizes - to shift over the next decade.
Where the risk hits hardest
AI that drafts letters, categorises claims, or flags anomalies can strip hours of manual work out of a week. The trade-off is real: back-office positions are the traditional launchpad into underwriting, claims, and operations leadership.
If those roles shrink, the industry loses an informal apprenticeship system. We'll need intentional pathways to replace it.
The paradox at the top
Higher-paid jobs aren't insulated. The same research shows roles earning more than US$100,000 often carry greater exposure because they rely on cognitive and language work.
Analysts, accountants, underwriters, and legal professionals are already using AI to summarise reports, spot patterns, and draft documents. Those who learn these tools gain speed; those who don't risk slipping behind.
Canadian carriers like Intact, Manulife, and Aviva Canada are piloting AI for claims triage, fraud detection, and policy admin. It's framed as support, not replacement - but the line is getting thinner.
Regulation and trust: the Canadian constraints
This is a tightly regulated business. Federal and provincial regulators are clear: accountability stays with people. Human judgment anchors claims decisions and client conversations.
That may slow automation, but it won't stop adoption. As models improve, competitive pressure will grow. The real challenge is keeping trust and transparency while systems operate faster than human oversight.
What leaders should do now
- Map task exposure, not just job titles: Identify workflows heavy on structured data and standardised communication.
- Redesign roles around judgment: Let AI handle drafting and retrieval; have people focus on exception handling, negotiation, and relationship work.
- Keep a human in the loop: Define decision rights, escalation paths, and audit trails for every AI-assisted step.
- Stand up model governance: Data quality checks, prompt libraries, approval workflows, and bias/accuracy testing tied to risk tiers.
- Protect the talent pipeline: Create rotational programs and mentorship to replace the learning that used to happen in clerical roles.
- Reskill early: Train for skills AI struggles with - context, empathy, ethical reasoning, complex negotiation.
- Measure results: Track cycle time, error rates, leakage, and customer outcomes - not just cost per claim or per policy.
Team-level wins in 90 days
- Claims: Auto-summarise FNOL, pre-fill templates, and surface similar past claims for adjusters.
- Underwriting: Pre-build risk summaries from broker submissions and third-party data; flag missing data.
- Broker ops: Draft client emails, compare policy wordings, and prep renewal notes.
- Compliance: Generate first drafts of control evidence and filing summaries; keep humans final.
- Customer service: Use retrieval-based responses from approved knowledge bases with strict guardrails.
- Quality control: Sample and review AI outputs weekly; feed corrections back into prompts and playbooks.
Career moves that pay off
- Get fluent with one AI tool that helps your day-to-day work. Build a small workflow and track time saved.
- Document your prompts, guardrails, and results. That portfolio matters in performance reviews and job moves.
- Learn data basics: how inputs affect outputs, how to verify sources, and when to escalate.
- Double down on human skills: client empathy, commercial judgment, and clear writing.
On average, about a third of tasks in many roles can already be improved or sped up by AI. The edge comes from how you redesign the other two-thirds.
Helpful resources
Training and tools
- AI courses by job role for targeted reskilling paths
- AI tools for finance to test in underwriting, claims, and ops
Bottom line: AI isn't coming for every job, but it is coming for the structured, paper-heavy work that used to define stability. If we use it to free time for judgment and client service - and invest in new pathways for talent - Canada's insurance sector can come out ahead.
Your membership also unlocks:
