AI-Penned Romance Hits No. 1 on Kakuyomu, Triggering a Brawl Over Algorithms and Authorship

An AI-written romance hit #1 on Kakuyomu by flooding feeds with fast, frequent chapters. To keep up, focus on steady releases, clear AI labels, and hooks that earn the next tap.

Categorized in: AI News Writers
Published on: Oct 30, 2025
AI-Penned Romance Hits No. 1 on Kakuyomu, Triggering a Brawl Over Algorithms and Authorship

An AI Novel Just Hit #1 on Kakuyomu. Here's What Writers Need to Do Now

An AI-written romance climbed to the top of the daily rankings on Kakuyomu, Kadokawa's massive web-fiction platform. It wasn't a fluke-it was output, cadence, and algorithm fluency.

The author, publishing under the name Natsumi Nai, used AI to produce roughly 100,000 kanji per day and posted chapters at high frequency. The platform rewards frequent updates, page views, and follower growth. More chapters led to more visibility, which led to even more chapters being read. Flywheel engaged.

What Happened

The novel-a women's-oriented isekai love story titled "I Bumped Into a Girl at a Corner and Used Healing Magic on Her, Curing Her of an Incurable Disease and Blindness, and She Became Very Attached to Me."-hit #1 on Kakuyomu's daily comprehensive rankings. The plot: Yuuki, a former office worker, is reborn with overpowered healing magic; he cures Lunaria, a duke's daughter, and they fall in love.

The first episode alone drew ~50,000 page views. Kakuyomu's ad-revenue model can turn those views into tens of thousands of yen per month. Because Kadokawa controls print, manga, anime, and merch pipelines, a breakout on Kakuyomu can snowball into a full media franchise.

The Flashpoint

Speed and volume triggered the backlash, not just the AI label. Templates guided AI generation to produce readable, long-form output at a pace a human can't match. Critics argue this floods rankings, drowns slower writers, and leans on datasets built from human work-echoing past concerns about scraping, including a case where 120,000 Kakuyomu stories were allegedly collected without permission and later removed at Kadokawa's request.

Defenders say the scoreboard is the text itself. If readers stay, it counts. They also argue that effective AI use still requires human direction-plotting, tone, and quality control-and that weak work (human or AI) gets filtered by readers over time.

The Apology

After the ranking surge, Natsumi Nai posted: "I sincerely apologize for not providing sufficient explanation to you all regarding the writing methodology for this work… This work was primarily written using AI technology… I should have made it clear in the first place readers would see it."

Transparency will be a baseline expectation moving forward. Expect labels, platform rules, or both.

Why This Matters for Working Writers

Platforms optimize for engagement loops. AI supercharges those loops with speed. If you publish on systems like Kakuyomu, Wattpad, or similar portals, you're competing against pace, not just prose.

This isn't the first AI flare-up. It follows a July incident on Kakuyomu and broader debates since high-profile cases like an Akutagawa Prize winner that included a small percentage of AI-generated text. The pattern is clear: AI-assisted output is here, and readers are voting with clicks.

How the Algorithm Was "Played"-and How to Respond

  • Cadence > Perfection: Frequent updates boost discovery. Think serialized, not monolithic.
  • Volume fuels visibility: More chapters mean more entry points, more internal recirculation, more favorites.
  • Compounding attention: Early spikes beget ranking momentum. Momentum begets more readers.

As a writer, you can either complain about the rules or write a strategy that works with them. Choose the latter.

Practical Playbook for Writers

1) Publish in Sprints

Break arcs into short, consistent chapters (800-1,500 words). Post daily or set a reliable multi-day cadence. Readers reward predictability.

2) Use AI as a Drafting Engine, Keep You as the Editor

  • Outline scenes, beats, and character goals first.
  • Generate a loose draft, then rewrite for voice, subtext, and continuity.
  • Create your own style and continuity guides to avoid template sameness.

3) Build Defensible Moats

  • Voice: Distinct phrasing, humor, and POV are hard to copy at scale.
  • World-bible: Deep lore and callbacks keep readers invested beyond "good enough."
  • Community: End-of-chapter notes, polls, and reader Q&A turn casual readers into regulars.

4) Train for Consistency

  • Set a chapter template for yourself: hook → conflict → turn → mini-resolution → teaser.
  • Track continuity (names, timeline, rules of magic/tech). AI drifts-your job is to prevent it.

5) Label Your Process

Disclose AI assistance up front. It builds trust, preempts backlash, and aligns with likely platform policies. Readers don't need perfection; they want honesty and a great story.

6) Optimize for the Platform You're On

  • Short titles with clear hooks often outperform, but long, high-concept titles can pull clicks in certain genres.
  • Front-load conflict, avoid meandering intros. Earn the next tap, every time.
  • Use cliffhangers and series hooks to increase session length and return visits.

7) Monetize Smart

  • Leverage ad-share where offered; then diversify: Patreon, direct sales, early-access chapters.
  • Package arcs into ebooks. Think in seasons; sell in volumes.

Policy and Platform Reality

Expect labeling standards, throttles on mass posting, or separate AI categories. That helps discovery and keeps human writers from being buried by sheer volume. Still, the core ranking logic will stay tied to engagement.

If you're serious about publishing on an algorithmic platform, act like a studio: production schedule, editorial standards, and a reader feedback loop. That's how you stay visible-AI or not.

Key Risks to Manage

  • Homogenization: Template-driven stories can feel samey. Counter with specific details and genuine stakes.
  • Continuity errors: Long-form AI drafts drift. Maintain strict story bibles.
  • Reader fatigue: High volume without progress kills interest. Keep arcs moving.

Bottom Line

AI didn't "kill writing." It compressed production time and changed the game loop. The writers who thrive will ship on a schedule, keep a strong voice, and treat platforms like markets with rules to learn.

If you publish online, your competition isn't the best sentence-it's the next tap. Write accordingly.

Resources


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)