Speed Gains in AI-Driven Development Come With Quality Trade-Offs
Software development teams are shipping code faster with AI assistance, but organizations are knowingly deploying untested software at scale to keep pace with leadership demands, according to a survey of over 2,500 technology leaders and developers.
Six in ten organizations report deploying untested code in 2026. The shift in reasoning matters: last year, teams attributed this mostly to accidental quality slips. Now 32% cite direct pressure from leadership to prioritize speed, and 30% say the volume of AI-generated code has become too large to test fully.
A significant confidence gap exists between executives and the teams executing the work. More than 81% of CEOs report high confidence in AI-driven systems, compared to 56% of QA and DevOps professionals. When asked about readiness to operationalize and scale AI agents across the software development lifecycle, 44% of C-level executives said their organization is very prepared. Only 23% of QA and DevOps leaders agreed.
The disparity reflects a fundamental misalignment. What leadership views as progress often translates to operational friction on engineering teams managing the complexity and risk of accelerated delivery.
The research comes from a survey spanning multiple industries-manufacturing, energy, retail, financial services, and the public sector-conducted by Texas software firm Tricentis.
The Volume Problem
Teams face a genuine constraint: AI-generated code scales faster than testing capacity. When development velocity increases without corresponding gains in quality assurance resources, organizations face a choice between slowing down or accepting risk.
The current response is clear. Rather than invest in testing infrastructure, many teams are accepting untested code as a cost of maintaining competitive speed.
What This Means for Development Teams
QA and DevOps professionals need to communicate the operational realities of speed-at-scale to leadership. The data shows this conversation isn't happening effectively.
Teams should also prepare for the testing challenges ahead. As AI code generation becomes standard practice, the ability to test at volume-through automation, risk-based prioritization, and intelligent test selection-will separate organizations that maintain quality from those that don't.
Your membership also unlocks:
