AI won't just change how we work. It will change how we grow.
Tools are getting smarter. That means your skill development can't lag a year behind the tech stack. Even large firms are rethinking training models. PwC, for example, has pushed continuous, AI-aware upskilling into day-to-day work instead of relying on static ladders and titles.
If technology speeds up, growth systems have to speed up too. The question for IT and development teams: what happens to the entry level when the "reps" that built fundamentals get automated?
The entry-level dilemma
For years, help desk tickets and routine fixes taught people how systems behave under normal conditions. Those reps built intuition. Now AI absorbs much of that repetitive work.
The risk: early-career pros jump straight to an answer instead of forming a mental model. Titles move forward, but depth stalls. That's a quiet failure that shows up later-during incidents, migrations, and audits.
Why repetition mattered (and what replaces it)
Repetition wires patterns. It teaches failure modes, not just happy paths. If an assistant provides the fix, you still need the "why," or your judgment won't hold under pressure.
So replace 100 identical tickets with 100 clear explanations, decisions, and post-incident notes. Make reasoning the rep.
Redesign early-career growth with intent
If AI does the grunt work, development must be woven into delivery. Don't hope people "pick it up." Build forcing functions into the workflow.
Tactics you can implement this quarter
- Explain the rec: Before applying any AI-suggested change, juniors write a 3-part note-problem, rationale, risks. Mentor signs off.
- Shadow, then lead: Pair on incidents. Week 1: observe. Week 2: drive with a safety net. Week 3: own a small scope end-to-end.
- Rotation sprints: Move through networking, SRE, cloud IaC, and security reviews. Each sprint ends with a demo and a design note.
- Sandbox and break-fix: Keep a production-like lab. Schedule chaos drills that mirror your top 10 real outages. Archive each run with lessons learned.
- PR gates: Every AI-aided pull request includes a diff review, a rollback plan, and verification steps someone else can follow.
- Toggle assistance: 1 day a week with assistants off to pressure-test fundamentals. Then compare approaches and document trade-offs.
Make learning measurable
- Time to independent ownership: How long until a junior can own a small service without hand-holding?
- Novel problems solved: Count issues resolved that weren't copy-paste from prior tickets or assistant prompts.
- Explanation quality: Peer-rated clarity of "why" notes in tickets, PRs, and postmortems.
- PR rework rate: How often do assistant-generated changes need fixes later?
- Incidents led: Postmortems facilitated by early-career engineers each quarter.
Evolving the entry-level role
Entry level isn't going away; it's changing. The new baseline includes reasoning, verification, and tooling awareness.
- Systems thinking: Trace requests across services. Map failure domains. Predict blast radius before you touch anything.
- Model skepticism: Treat assistant output as a draft. Validate against logs, metrics, runbooks, and constraints.
- Automation literacy: Write small, safe scripts. Add guardrails. Log everything. Keep human checkpoints where it matters.
- Ops communication: Crisp updates during incidents. Clear handoffs. Concise postmortems with action items.
Embed learning into the work, not after it
Continuous upskilling isn't a course you bookmark; it's a workflow you adopt. Some enterprises are building this directly into roles and reviews. See how one firm framed it here: PwC's GenAI tools and training announcement.
If you need structured paths mapped to IT and dev jobs, explore focused programs by role: AI courses by job role.
A simple operating system for early-career growth
- Daily: Log one decision you made, why you made it, and how you verified it.
- Weekly: Run a short "failure replay" of a real ticket. Recreate it in the lab. Try two fixes. Compare outcomes.
- Biweekly: Present a 5-minute teach-back on a core topic (DNS, IAM, retries/backoff, idempotency, transactions).
- Monthly: Lead a mini-incident sim with a mentor. Publish the postmortem and a runbook update.
- Quarterly: Ship a small automation with tests, metrics, and a rollback. Review it like a production service.
Guardrails for AI-first teams
- Add "why" notes to every AI-generated change, not just the code.
- Keep a living library of assistant failure cases so new hires learn the edges faster.
- Rotate "human-on-top" pairing: one drives, one challenges assumptions and checks blast radius.
- Stick to runbooks that explain decisions, not just steps. Steps are for tools; judgment is for people.
Bottom line
AI can clear the busywork. It can't give you judgment. That comes from reps-reps in explanation, verification, and owning outcomes.
If you lead a team, build those reps into the job. If you're early in your career, don't skip the "why." Write it down. Share it. Get it reviewed. That's how you grow without waiting for 100 identical tickets to land in your queue.
Your membership also unlocks:
