Americans Are Letting AI Shop-and Even Bind-Their Car Insurance
AI has moved from novelty to default option for a big share of U.S. drivers. In a survey of 3,002 drivers, 42% said they've used an AI assistant to shop for car insurance, and 86% trust AI to guide them through buying coverage. The most common use case is quote comparison, with 76% using AI to line up options side by side.
Price sensitivity is a lever. While 39% would let AI finalize a policy to save money, that jumps to 68% if the savings hit $1,000. And perception is shifting: 52% think AI can compare quotes better than an agent, and 42% of Gen Z say AI could handle customer service better than a human.
Who's Saying "Yes" to AI
Adoption skews young. About 60% of Gen Z drivers have used AI to shop for insurance, compared with ~20% of baby boomers. State-level adoption ranges from 55% in California to 34% in Illinois, with higher-cost states generally showing more AI usage.
State Snapshot: AI Use and Average Full-Cover Costs
- California: 55% - $2,525
- New York: 49% - $3,724
- Florida: 45% - $2,912
- Texas: 45% - $2,673
- Ohio: 41% - $1,472
- Pennsylvania: 41% - $2,082
- Georgia: 39% - $3,025
- North Carolina: 38% - $1,250
- Michigan: 36% - $3,131
- Illinois: 34% - $1,950
- United States (overall): 42% - $2,310
The Limits of Trust
Enthusiasm fades around decisions that feel consequential or punitive. Only 40% would trust AI to approve or deny claims, and 38% would trust it to decide fault after a crash. People want speed and savings from software-but a person to review outcomes that carry risk.
What Insurance Teams Should Do Now
- Offer AI-guided quote comparison with clear source disclosure and live price refresh. Show inputs and assumptions, not just outputs.
- Use human-in-the-loop for bind, coverage advice, and claims decisions. Make escalation easy and visible.
- Build consent and transparency into flows: what data you use, why you use it, and how to opt out.
- Run fairness checks by state, age cohort, and channel. Log decisions and make explanations retrievable.
- Pilot "dual-run" bind flows: AI drafts, agents review. Track bind rate, time-to-bind, complaint rate, and post-bind churn.
- Instrument every step. Set KPIs for quote accuracy, handling time, resolution rate, and CSAT after AI intervention.
- Train frontline teams on prompt hygiene, disclosure language, and error handling. Create simple playbooks for common scenarios.
- Keep claims triage assistive: summarize, flag inconsistencies, and rank next actions-but keep final decisions human-owned.
Product and Workflow Ideas (Quick Wins)
- AI shopping assistant embedded on your site that compares quotes, highlights coverage gaps, and explains trade-offs in plain English.
- Auto-fill applications from license/garaging data with user confirmation to cut abandon rates.
- Proactive re-shopping triggers when premiums jump or driver profile changes, with one-click handoff to an agent.
- Claims intake copilot that structures narratives, extracts entities, and drafts follow-up questions for adjusters.
Risk, Compliance, and Governance
- Document model purpose, data sources, and known limits. Version prompts and policies.
- Provide adverse action reasoning where applicable and keep audit trails.
- Red-team prompts for biased or misleading advice before launch and on a schedule.
- Set a kill-switch and rollback plan for any consumer-facing AI that touches pricing, eligibility, or claim disposition.
Source: Insurify. For regulatory context and principles, see NAIC guidance on AI.
Level Up Team Skills
If you're building AI-assisted distribution or claims workflows, upskilling your team pays off fast. Explore practical training by role here: AI courses by job.
Your membership also unlocks:
