A press release for Fi's satellite-enabled dog collar campaign arrived with a bold claim: "It's AI but not AI slop." The campaign video, produced by AI-first creative studio Dolsten & Co, raises a question that matters to any creative working with generative tools - is the difference between good AI and slop just how well the technology hides itself?
The studio's approach involved training custom LoRA models on real dogs, consulting animal behaviourists on gait and breed-specific movement, and adding fake lens grime and handheld camera shake to avoid what the press release calls the technology's "instinct toward synthetic perfection." The result is a video where dogs move like actual dogs, not the uncanny approximations common in AI-generated content.
The craft is real
Building consistent AI dogs is difficult. Unlike static products or landscapes, animals are defined by unpredictable motion, and the data simply isn't there to make a believable dog from a simple prompt. To meet quality standards, Simon's team ran auditions for AI dogs, trained models per animal, and worked with behaviourists to get a German Shepherd's push-off stride right versus a husky's. That's actual craft, applied with rigour.
But craft was never the argument against AI slop. The objection to slop is that it's a lie badly told - that it looks fake and insults the viewer's intelligence. So isn't AI photorealism just telling the same lie better?
Knowing is the problem
Once you know a film is AI-generated, the knowledge changes how you watch it. You stop being a viewer and start being an inspector, hunting for the tell in the fur, the eye, the paw. That shift matters for audience trust, and saying something is "AI, but not AI slop" may not fix it.
The disclosure dilemma
Keeping quiet about AI use entirely is one alternative. Many would have assumed the ad was created with traditional CG methods. But hiding it risks being found out, and people often react more strongly to the cover-up than the act itself. YouTube's rules also require creators to flag "realistic" AI content, leaving advertisers with little room to stay silent.
The "AI but not AI slop" tag is likely something we'll hear often in the next couple of years. Whether audiences will reject it or grow wearily accepting remains an open question.
Why this matters for creatives
For creatives, the Fi campaign underscores a tension between craft and transparency that's central to AI for Creatives. Audiences may reward technical skill but also feel misled if AI use is hidden. The challenge is to integrate AI without eroding trust - a balance that will shape client briefs and audience expectations in the coming years.
Your membership also unlocks:
