AppLovin Under Scrutiny: Legal and Ethical Risks Threaten Long-Term Value
In early 2025, AppLovin Corporation (NASDAQ: APP) found itself at the center of intense scrutiny, not for its innovations, but due to a series of legal and ethical challenges. Once a favored stock in the AI-driven advertising space, AppLovin’s reputation took a hit amid allegations of securities fraud, deceptive marketing, and governance failures. For legal professionals and investors alike, the pressing question isn't about growth potential anymore—it’s whether AppLovin can weather this storm and sustain its business.
A Perfect Storm of Litigation and Regulatory Scrutiny
The company’s troubles began when short-seller firms like Culper Research and Muddy Waters released reports in early 2025 accusing AppLovin of manipulative tactics. These included “clickjacking,” “backdoor installations,” and reverse-engineering data from platforms such as Meta. The aim, they claimed, was to artificially boost ad click-through rates and app downloads. These allegations were backed by technical evidence suggesting that AppLovin’s AI-powered AXON 2.0 platform was more of a smokescreen masking unethical practices than an innovative breakthrough.
The stock reacted swiftly, plunging 32.3% within two weeks and wiping out billions in market value. This triggered securities class-action lawsuits, notably Quiero v. AppLovin Corp., where the company and its executives face accusations of violating Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The lawsuits allege that AppLovin misrepresented the sources of its growth by attributing success to AI innovation while allegedly engaging in exploitative user permission tactics and ad fraud.
Governance Failures: A Leadership Crisis
Beyond legal battles, concerns about AppLovin’s corporate governance have surfaced. The board, including members like Maynard Webb (appointed April 2025), is criticized for its oversight of the AI platform and alleged fraudulent activities. Despite board changes, such as Edward Oberwager’s voluntary exit, investor confidence remains shaky.
The board’s unanimous approval of selling AppLovin’s mobile gaming division to Tripledot in May 2025 has done little to ease concerns. The core issue is a disconnect between the company’s public statements and internal controls. Executives emphasized the role of “cutting-edge AI” in driving growth, yet internal reviews and external audits reportedly uncovered systemic problems. This opacity has sparked accusations of fiduciary breaches, with law firms like Kahn Swick & Foti, LLC investigating whether directors and officers prioritized short-term gains over ethical compliance.
The AI-Washing Trend and Broader Implications
AppLovin’s situation highlights a broader issue in tech: “AI-washing,” where companies exaggerate AI capabilities to attract investment. This trend has spurred a wave of securities litigation in 2025, targeting firms like Skyworks Solutions as well. For AppLovin, whose business model heavily depends on AI-driven ad metrics, the risks are particularly acute. If proven, these allegations could invalidate the company’s core value proposition.
Regulators are paying close attention. The SEC and Department of Justice have indicated a tougher stance on AI-related disclosures, especially where data manipulation might distort financial reports. AppLovin’s exclusion from the S&P 500 in June 2025—a rare and significant move—reflects the market’s growing distrust.
Investment Implications: Proceed with Caution
For investors, AppLovin’s path forward carries significant uncertainty. Legal and regulatory expenses could erode shareholder value, while reputational harm may deter partners and talent. Even a successful legal defense won't guarantee restoring trust in a business model now perceived as ethically compromised.
- Legal Exposure: Settlements from ongoing lawsuits could total billions, potentially forcing dividend cuts or asset sales.
- Governance Reforms: Board changes are a start, but independent audits of AI practices and stronger internal controls are essential.
- Market Positioning: Competitors are distancing themselves from AppLovin’s practices, risking accelerated loss of market share.
Conclusion: A Cautionary Tale for the AI Era
AppLovin’s challenges serve as a cautionary example of the risks when AI hype overshadows ethical business conduct. AI cannot replace the need for transparency and accountability. Moving forward, AppLovin must address not just legal defenses but also fundamental governance and ethical reforms to regain trust.
Until then, the stock remains high-risk, better suited for short-term traders than long-term investors. As regulatory scrutiny over AI disclosures intensifies, companies must ensure honesty in their claims to avoid similar pitfalls.
Your membership also unlocks:
