Australia's National AI Plan: Light-Touch Regulation, Stronger Enforcement Support
Australia will keep a light-touch approach to AI regulation, building on existing legal and regulatory frameworks. In a joint statement tied to the National AI Plan, Assistant Minister for Science and Technology Andrew Charlton and Minister for Industry and Innovation Tim Ayres confirmed that established laws will remain the foundation for addressing AI-related risks.
The government has allocated A$29.9 million (US$19.5 million) to establish an AI Safety Institute in early 2026. The institute will provide independent advice to support existing regulators and help ensure AI companies comply with Australian laws.
What stays the same
- AI will be governed primarily through current laws-privacy, consumer protection, competition, safety, and anti-discrimination.
- Regulators retain their powers; the new institute will add expert advice and technical support, not replace them.
- Compliance expectations focus on outcomes: lawful, fair, safe, and accountable AI deployments.
What's new
- AI Safety Institute operational target: early 2026, funded at A$29.9 million.
- Mandate: provide independent advice to regulators and strengthen oversight of AI companies' compliance with Australian law.
Implications for government agencies
Expect more consistent guidance and clearer expectations across portfolios. The policy choice avoids creating a new standalone AI law now, but increases scrutiny on how existing obligations are met when AI is used.
For public sector AI projects, the bar is unchanged-but the audit trail will matter more. Privacy impact assessments, safety testing, explainability where feasible, and vendor compliance evidence should be treated as standard practice.
Immediate actions for government teams
- Map current and planned AI use cases; link each to relevant laws and regulator guidance.
- Update procurement templates to require: model provenance, risk assessments, ongoing monitoring plans, and incident reporting.
- Run privacy and safety impact assessments before deployment; document mitigations and approvals.
- Set clear human-in-the-loop and redress pathways for high-risk decisions.
- Require vendors to provide testing summaries, data governance practices, and compliance attestations.
- Prepare to engage with the AI Safety Institute for technical advice once established.
For regulators
- Identify AI-related enforcement priorities within your existing remit (e.g., misleading claims, unfair contract terms, bias, safety risks).
- Standardize guidance and templates for AI audits, evidence requests, and record-keeping.
- Coordinate with peer regulators to avoid overlap and close gaps; the institute can assist with technical depth.
For policy and legal teams
- Align internal policies with the "existing laws first" approach; publish practical compliance checklists for agencies and suppliers.
- Clarify thresholds for high-risk AI in your context and required controls (testing, human oversight, transparency).
- Plan for periodic reviews as the institute ramps up and issues new advice.
Helpful references
- Australia's AI Ethics Principles - useful baseline for governance and risk controls.
- NIST AI Risk Management Framework - practical tool for risk identification, measurement, and mitigation.
Upskilling your team
If you're building capability across procurement, compliance, or delivery, curated AI course paths by job function can help standardize training and shorten onboarding.
The direction is clear: Australia will enforce AI through laws you already use, with added technical support to make compliance more concrete. Get your governance in order now, so you're ready when the institute comes online in 2026.
Your membership also unlocks:
