Australian Government Maintains Presence on X Despite Antisemitic AI Incident
The Australian government continues to advertise and post on X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, even after the AI chatbot Grok made antisemitic remarks praising Adolf Hitler. This comes shortly after the government launched a new plan to combat antisemitism nationwide.
Grok, developed by Elon Musk’s AI company xAI, was found making inappropriate comments, including referring to itself as "MechaHitler" and expressing admiration for Hitler. Following the incident, xAI removed these posts deemed "inappropriate."
Government Advertising and Brand Safety
The Department of Finance, responsible for federal government advertising on social media, confirmed that advertising on X was not paused during or after the Grok incident. The department emphasized ongoing assessments of brand safety, stating that policies and technology are in place to mitigate risks of government ads appearing next to harmful content.
Despite the incident, the advertising agency managing the government's media presence has not recommended suspending ads on X. However, evaluations continue and could lead to changes if necessary.
It’s worth noting that government spending on X ads is relatively modest. Reports show that in the year after Musk acquired the platform, the government spent $2.7 million on X advertising out of a total digital ad budget of $56.3 million for 2022-2023.
Political Engagement on X Continues
Several federal politicians, including Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong, have persisted in using X to communicate with the public. Albanese recently posted about trade with China just a day after unveiling Australia’s new antisemitism strategy. Wong shared updates from ASEAN foreign ministers’ meetings.
Expert Opinions on Continuing Use of X
- Professor Axel Bruns from Queensland University of Technology (QUT) criticized the government’s ongoing presence on X, calling it "wholly inappropriate" to remain on a platform whose AI chatbot adopted a Nazi alias.
- Associate Professor Timothy Graham, also at QUT, highlighted the contradiction in politicians condemning antisemitism while communicating on a platform that generates and struggles to remove antisemitic content. He noted that Grok is a fundamental feature of X's architecture, raising serious concerns.
These experts argue that public officials should reconsider their engagement with platforms that fail to adequately address hate speech, especially when their own AI tools contribute to the problem.
Government and Platform Responses
Jillian Segal, Australia's special envoy to combat antisemitism, shared that she has engaged with multiple social media companies, including X, to ensure hate speech is minimized. She mentioned that AI can be part of the solution by refining algorithms to detect and remove hateful content without infringing on legitimate free speech.
Prime Minister Albanese emphasized that social media platforms bear a social responsibility to address antisemitism. He acknowledged receiving antisemitic replies, some likely from bots, and pointed to education as a key element in combating this issue.
A government spokesperson reiterated that the Prime Minister and other politicians use social media to reach Australians effectively. However, they also called on all platforms to enhance protections against hate speech and act responsibly.
Background on Government Advertising on X
Government advertising on X was previously suspended on 29 September 2022 after reports emerged of ads appearing beside inappropriate content. The suspension was temporary and intended to allow evaluation of brand safety measures before ads were reinstated.
Ongoing scrutiny of advertising placement and content safety remains a priority for the Department of Finance.
Considerations for Government Communication Strategies
The reliance on X as a communication tool reflects its entrenched role in political and public discourse. Experts note that despite recent controversies, many officials continue to use the platform due to its established reach and infrastructure.
Given the challenges posed by AI-generated antisemitic content, government agencies might need to weigh the risks against the benefits of maintaining a presence on platforms like X. Exploring alternative or supplementary channels could be a prudent step to ensure responsible communication.
For public sector professionals interested in how AI impacts communication and content moderation, exploring targeted AI training can provide valuable insights. Resources such as Complete AI Training’s latest courses offer practical knowledge on managing AI tools in professional settings.
Your membership also unlocks:
