Banks lead AI adoption in South Africa's financial sector
Regulation | 08 Dec, 2025
A new joint report from the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) and the Prudential Authority (PA) shows banks account for 52% of AI adopters in South Africa's financial sector. Payment providers and pension funds follow behind, indicating AI is moving from pilots to production where data scale and risk controls are most mature.
The report, released at the end of November and based on the regulators' 2024 survey, highlights where AI is creating value and where it introduces risk. You can read more about the regulators here: Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) and the Prudential Authority (PA).
What AI delivers right now
Across sectors, the biggest benefit is clear: better data and analytical insights. Productivity gains come next, as teams automate repeatable decisioning and workflows.
- Faster analysis for credit, liquidity, and pricing.
- Operational automation in service, onboarding, and reconciliation.
- Stronger detection signals for fraud, AML, and transaction anomalies.
The risk picture
The top risks identified are data privacy and protection, with cybersecurity close behind. As AI scales, exposure grows through more data flows, more vendors, and more integration points.
- Data governance: data minimization, lineage, retention, encryption, and access control.
- Model risk: documentation, validation, performance drift, and change management.
- Third-party risk: vendor due diligence, contract controls, and exit plans.
- Security: API hardening, incident playbooks, red-teaming models, and continuous monitoring.
Why banks are ahead
Banks operate at scale, with established risk frameworks and larger data estates-prime conditions for AI adoption. They also face strong competitive pressure in payments, lending, and customer experience, making efficiency and precision non-negotiable.
Payment providers and pension funds are following where AI can enhance fraud controls, KYC/AML, claims, and portfolio oversight without adding undue operational risk.
What finance leaders should do next
- Run an AI inventory: map every use case, model, dataset, and vendor; assign owners.
- Set hard guardrails: privacy-by-design, least-privilege access, and auditable logs.
- Tighten model governance: pre-deployment testing, bias checks, and drift monitoring.
- Prove value: define ROI metrics (loss reduction, hours saved, decision accuracy) and review quarterly.
- Control vendors: require validation reports, security attestations, and clear data-use terms.
- Upskill teams: data literacy for business, model risk for audit/compliance, and secure AI practices for engineering.
Implications for compliance and audit
- Document decisions: keep human-in-the-loop records for high-impact outcomes.
- Segment data: apply stricter controls for PII and sensitive financial data.
- Test resilience: simulate breaches and model failures; verify incident response.
- Report readiness: align artifacts to regulatory reviews and upcoming supervisory guidance.
Looking ahead
Expect tighter supervisory focus on privacy, cybersecurity, and explainability as adoption grows. Firms that can prove data discipline, measurable outcomes, and strong controls will move faster with fewer surprises.
Exploring practical tools for finance teams? See a curated set of AI tools for finance to accelerate analysis, controls, and reporting.
Your membership also unlocks:
