BNY Legal's 75% Efficiency Gain: The Governance Blueprint for Enterprise AI Adoption
BNY Mellon's legal team cut average contract review time by 75% with an internal AI assistant built on Eliza and OpenAI's models. The lesson is clear: in regulated environments, governance makes scale possible.
This isn't about flashy demos. It's about building a system legal can trust-auditable, controllable, and safe by default.
Why this matters to in-house counsel
Contracts are high volume and high stakes. Cycle time, consistency, and auditability define success.
BNY's approach shows how to deliver all three without risking confidentiality, privilege, or regulatory exposure.
The platform pattern: a secure wrapper over best-in-class models
Eliza acts as the governance layer. It manages data ingress and egress, applies policy, enforces access controls, and logs every action for audit.
This lets the firm use external model capabilities while keeping tight control over data handling, bias checks, and traceability.
What changed in the legal workflow
- First-pass review: summaries, clause extraction, and exceptions flagged against playbooks.
- Consistency checks: version comparisons and deviations from standards surfaced fast.
- Attorney control: clear approvals, edits, and overrides remain with humans.
- Coverage at scale: repetitive analysis moves to the assistant; judgment stays with counsel.
Measurable outcomes
A 75% reduction in average review time. Less context switching. Fewer manual lookups. Attorneys focus on novel issues and strategy instead of rote comparison work.
As Watt Wanapha noted, the assistant improves "speed, quality, [and] consistency" across reviews.
Governance as the enabler
In financial services, model capability is secondary to deployment discipline. As Sarthak Pattanaik put it, they led with "governance guardrails and responsible AI principles by design."
This reframes governance from constraint to confidence. It's the reason stakeholders say yes.
A practical blueprint you can use
- Pick one high-volume, high-stakes use case: NDAs, MSAs, or trading agreements.
- Adopt a risk framework (e.g., the NIST AI RMF) and define risk classes, review gates, and escalation paths.
- Build a secure app layer that controls prompts, redacts sensitive data, logs every interaction, and enforces least-privilege access.
- Pin model versions. Validate with held-out test sets tied to your clause library and playbooks.
- Set measurable thresholds (accuracy, escalation rate, false-positive/negative rates). Route beyond-threshold items to humans.
- Use approved sources (RAG) for citations. No free-text speculation on critical points.
- Codify privilege boundaries, confidentiality levels, and retention rules. Keep immutable audit trails.
- Train attorneys on prompts, limits, and review protocols. Reward adoption tied to quality metrics.
- Vendor diligence: data use, retention, sub-processors, regional storage, incident response, and audit support.
Risk controls that build trust
- Data minimization and on-the-fly redaction before any external call.
- Output filters for hallucination risk; require sources for critical assertions.
- Bias and safety testing using representative matters; document results.
- Clear disclaimers: the assistant drafts; attorneys decide.
- Continuous monitoring: drift alerts, error sampling, and quarterly re-validation.
Questions legal leaders should ask vendors
- Is our data used to train or fine-tune your models? What retention policies apply?
- Where is data processed and stored? Which sub-processors are involved?
- Can we pin model versions and get model cards, evals, and change logs?
- What's the measured hallucination rate on legal tasks? How is it mitigated?
- What audit evidence can we obtain-logs, prompts, outputs, and review actions?
The role shift for legal
The assistant handles the first pass and comparison work. Attorneys move sooner to interpretation, negotiation posture, and risk tradeoffs.
This turns the legal team from a queue bottleneck into a strategic partner that accelerates deals and reduces variance.
Policy horizon
Keep your controls current with emerging regulations. The EU AI Act and sector guidance raise expectations on documentation, testing, and oversight.
If you can evidence control today, you're ready for tomorrow's audits.
Bottom line
BNY Mellon shows that safe scale is achievable: a secure platform layer, clear guardrails, and measurable results. Start small, instrument everything, and keep humans in charge of judgment.
If you're building skills across your legal team, here's a curated route to speed that up: AI courses by job function.
Your membership also unlocks:
