Ada County's first arrest under Idaho's AI child-exploitation law: What legal teams should know
A Boise resident, Tyler Cox, 19, was arrested Tuesday by the Ada County Sheriff's Office on suspicion of possessing child sexually exploitative material and visual representations of sexual abuse of a minor. Investigators said they recovered content depicting both real and AI-generated minors. Each allegation is charged as a felony under Idaho law.
According to online court records, Cox's arraignment is set for December 31 at the Ada County Courthouse. He is currently held at the Ada County Jail.
The statute and its reach
In 2024, Idaho enacted a law that explicitly criminalizes the creation or possession of AI- or machine-learning-generated images or videos showing a child engaged in explicit sexual conduct. The measure was drafted to close gaps where synthetic media previously fell into legal gray areas.
Practically, prosecutors still need to prove knowing possession. But they no longer need to prove a real child was used if the depiction meets the statute's definitions. Pay close attention to how "child," "explicit sexual conduct," and "visual depiction" are defined, and whether "synthetic," "digitally created," or "indistinguishable from a minor" language is incorporated into the charging statute.
Key elements likely at issue
- Knowing possession or control of the files (device ownership, login ties, timestamps, cloud accounts).
- That the material depicts a "child" as defined by statute, including synthetic depictions if covered.
- That the content meets the statutory definition of "explicit sexual conduct."
- That AI-generated media qualifies as a prohibited "visual depiction" under the law.
- For any distribution/production counts: proof of transmission, creation steps, or solicitation.
Anticipated litigation and motion practice
- Search and seizure: scope of warrants for devices, cloud backups, and third-party platforms; particularity and overbreadth challenges.
- Forensics: chain of custody; completeness of extractions; handling of deleted files, thumbnails, caches, and hash matches.
- AI identification: Daubert challenges to expert testimony on detecting synthetic imagery; reliability of classifiers and model outputs; reproducibility of methods.
- Constitutional issues: overbreadth/vagueness and First Amendment questions in light of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition (2002); whether the statute tracks "obscene" or "indistinguishable from a minor" standards.
- Duplicative charging: separating counts for real and synthetic depictions; unit of prosecution for multiple files.
- Protective orders and discovery: safe handling and review of contraband images; defense expert access protocols.
Enforcement context
The Sheriff's Office noted this is its first arrest under the AI-specific provision in Ada County. Statewide, officials have reported multiple convictions under the law since it took effect, and a Nampa pastor was arrested in September on several child pornography charges, including one tied to AI-generated content.
Immediate action items for counsel
- Get the warrant, affidavits, and return; assess probable cause and device scope.
- Request full forensic reports, tool versions, and examiner credentials; preserve logs and hash sets.
- Clarify which files underpin each charge (real vs. synthetic) and the elements the State intends to prove.
- Evaluate pretrial release, technology restrictions, and no-contact/Internet conditions.
- Prepare Daubert challenges for AI/synthetic-detection testimony and any automated classification.
- If appropriate, brief constitutional defenses aimed at definition, intent, and overbreadth issues.
What comes next
Cox's arraignment is scheduled for December 31. Expect early motion practice on search scope, definition of "visual depiction" for AI media, and the admissibility of expert testimony on synthetic-content identification. Discovery management and protective orders will be central due to the nature of the evidence.
Resource for legal teams building AI fluency
If your office is updating internal playbooks for AI-related cases and policy reviews, a focused primer helps. See a curated list of role-based AI courses for legal and compliance teams: Complete AI Training - Courses by Job.
Your membership also unlocks:
