Brandon Sanderson Weighs In On The Ongoing AI Debate: "I Don't Think You're An Artist"
Brandon Sanderson, author of the Mistborn and Stormlight Archive series, has joined the discussion about AI's role in creative fields. His view aligns with many bestselling authors who express concern about AI's use in publishing. While he acknowledges there are "interesting things" AI can do, Sanderson remains cautious about its place in creative work.
In a recent TikTok video, Sanderson openly shared his "bone to pick" with AI—specifically, how it's being used to generate art. He criticized those who claim the title of "AI artist" simply because they input prompts into AI tools. Sanderson likened this process to being an art director, who guides but does not claim authorship of the final work.
He explained, "People use AI for all sorts of interesting things. My stance is, as I've said before, a little against it in creative endeavors. I'm concerned. One of the things I'm concerned about is people are saying, 'Well, I'm an AI artist because I'm putting in the prompts.'"
Sanderson shared examples of Stormlight Archive sketches by Ben McSweeney, emphasizing the distinction between directing art and creating it. Though Sanderson provides ideas and instructions for the artwork in his novels, he never claims to be the artist himself. He said:
"I would never put my name as the artist on this piece of art. This is Ben McSweeney's art. He did the art. Now, I gave him the prompt, yes. I asked for it, I commissioned it, I pushed him on it, but it's his art."
He continued to highlight the concern many creators share about AI-generated art and writing. Sanderson pointed out that no matter how refined your prompts are, "the machine is making the art." He concluded his video with a blunt statement:
"I don't think you're an artist; I think you might be an art director to a machine."
What Brandon Sanderson's Take On AI Means For Publishing
The debate over AI's role in publishing has intensified recently. Authors like Victoria Aveyard and Adam Silvera have spoken out, urging the book community to address the ethical and creative challenges posed by AI. A federal court ruling allowing AI companies to train models on legally acquired copyrighted materials has further fueled tensions.
Having a high-profile author like Sanderson add his voice strengthens the conversation and underscores the urgency of defining AI's place in creative industries. His perspective resonates because it draws a clear line on ownership and creative contribution, a critical issue for writers and artists alike.
Practical Implications for Writers
- AI tools can assist but should not replace original creative work.
- Claiming authorship over AI-generated content, based solely on prompt input, may raise ethical and legal questions.
- Understanding the distinction between directing AI and creating art yourself protects your integrity as a writer or artist.
For writers interested in exploring AI responsibly, resources like Complete AI Training offer courses that cover practical and ethical aspects of AI tools in creative and professional settings.
Final Thoughts
Brandon Sanderson's comments provide a straightforward way to grasp why many in publishing are wary of AI-generated art and writing. His analogy between art direction and AI prompt input clarifies why using AI doesn’t equate to being the creator. This perspective is crucial for writers who want to maintain authenticity and protect their creative rights in an age where AI-generated content is increasingly prevalent.
Your membership also unlocks:
