AI news ·
California's SB 574 sets new AI rules for lawyers and arbitrators
California's SB 574 sets four binding rules for lawyers using AI: protect client data, avoid biased tools, verify all citations, and keep humans in charge of arbitration decisions. The law applies to all legal professionals in the state.
California SB 574 Sets Four New Requirements for Lawyers Using AI
California's SB 574 imposes specific rules on how lawyers and arbitrators can use artificial intelligence in their work. The law establishes four categories of requirements that take effect immediately for legal professionals in the state.
Protecting Confidential Information
Lawyers must keep nonpublic information out of public AI systems. This means avoiding tools that feed client data, case details, or settlement amounts into cloud-based generative AI platforms where the information could be retained or used for model training.
Preventing Discriminatory AI Use
The law requires non-discriminatory use of generative AI in legal work. Lawyers cannot rely on AI systems that produce biased outcomes based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or national origin.
Verifying All Citations
Filing attorneys must read and verify every citation in their documents-regardless of whether AI generated it. This applies to citations created by AI tools and those added by the attorney. The requirement shifts responsibility to the lawyer for accuracy.
Limiting AI in Arbitration Decisions
Arbitrators cannot delegate decision-making authority to AI systems. They must also disclose any AI tools they use in the arbitration process. The law preserves human judgment as the final authority in dispute resolution.
These rules apply to all legal professionals using AI in California, from solo practitioners to large firms. AI for Legal professionals covers compliance frameworks and practical implementation of these requirements.