CertiK and YZi Labs bring $1M audits and real-world safeguards to Web3

CertiK and YZi Labs team up to bring security to early Web3/AI builders, with a $1M audit grant and new tools. It unpacks the Truebit hack, Ledger leak, and concrete defenses.

Published on: Jan 11, 2026
CertiK and YZi Labs bring $1M audits and real-world safeguards to Web3

CertiK, YZi Labs Partner to Support AI and Web3-Focused Initiatives

Security is still lagging in crypto and Web3. CertiK's latest updates push that conversation forward with a mix of funding, tooling, and hard lessons from real incidents.

Partnership: Security Baked In at Day One

CertiK has partnered with YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs) to support founders in the EASY Residency Global Startup Incubation Program. The focus: Web3, AI, and biotech builders.

  • $1M auditing grant for incubated teams
  • Formal Verification, Skynet Boosting, and AI scanning
  • YZi Labs will connect projects with CertiK and push awareness of these tools

The intent is simple: treat security like structural engineering-so founders can build with confidence, not guesswork. As CertiK's leadership noted, partnerships like this raise the bar for ecosystem safety and make early-stage security a default, not an afterthought.

Truebit Exploit: What Went Wrong

On January 8, 2026, attackers hit Truebit with an integer overflow in the getPurchasePrice() function. They minted 240M TRU for 0 ETH, then swapped the tokens for roughly $26.6M in ETH.

The core issue: unchecked arithmetic. Large inputs wrapped the value to zero, allowing free token creation. Funds were split and some were moved through Tornado Cash. This wasn't novel-it was avoidable. Pricing and mint logic must be guarded against edge cases that push variables past their limits.

  • Use Solidity 0.8+ checked arithmetic and property-based tests for pricing paths (Solidity overflow changes)
  • Fuzz inputs around boundaries (max uint, near-zero, extreme slippage)
  • Apply Formal Verification for invariants like "no free mint" and "price integrity"
  • Isolate financial math, review it separately, and monitor on-chain with alerts

Data Leaks Fuel Scams: Lessons from the Ledger Incident

A breach via payment provider Global-e exposed Ledger customer names, addresses, emails, and order details. Seed phrases and payment info were not impacted. But the fallout is social engineering: that's where most people get burned.

  • Expect AI deepfakes mimicking executives
  • "Quishing" via malicious QR codes and fake mobile apps
  • Physical threats ("wrench attacks") using leaked addresses

Practical moves that help:

  • Use email aliases/masking for crypto services
  • Switch from SMS to app-based 2FA; add a hardware key (e.g., YubiKey)
  • Verify every transaction on the device screen, not just the app UI
  • Treat urgency as a red flag. Legit providers won't ask for seed phrases-ever

What This Means for Builders, Investors, and Users

  • Founders: Budget security from day zero. Get an audit plan, set test thresholds, and wire monitoring into your deployment checklist
  • Developers: Guard math and pricing logic first. Use checked arithmetic, fuzz tests, assertions, and formal methods on core flows
  • Investors: Ask for security artifacts-threat models, audits, incident response plans, and alerting
  • Users: Treat personal data like assets on-chain. Your inbox and device are attack surfaces

CertiK's updates show the full picture: fund security, study failures, and teach practical defense. Threats are getting more specialized. The projects that last will be the ones that assume failure modes exist-and engineer them out before mainnet.

Further Learning


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)
Advertisement
Stream Watch Guide