AI-written passages slip into print at Cairo book fair - a wake-up call for working writers
At the Cairo International Book Fair (CIBF 2026), several newly published Arabic novels reportedly included raw AI prompt-and-response text - the kind of internal instructions you type into a chatbot - left inside the final printed editions. Photos shared on social media show pages with directives about plot and character development, followed by the chatbot's system reply and then the story itself.
In one example, the AI reply promises to continue the narrative, focus on the relationship between two protagonists, and shift emphasis from past to present and future - after which the book moves straight into the opening line. The takeaway is simple: full blocks of AI-assisted draft were likely published without proper editing.
Why this matters for authors and editors
Trust is on the line. Readers expect clean, intentional prose - not your chat history. If prompt scaffolding slips into print, it signals weak editorial control and calls authorship into question.
The standard is shifting. AI can speed up drafting, but undisclosed or unedited reliance risks blurring the boundary between author and tool. Without strong guardrails, literary standards take a hit.
Practical guardrails if you use AI in your writing
- Separate drafting from production. Keep AI sessions in a sandboxed doc. Never paste raw prompts directly into your manuscript file.
- Strip the scaffolding. Before handoff, search for telltale cues: "As an AI…," "I will now…," "Let's focus on…," and section headers like "Prompt:" or "System:"
- Edit for voice and intent. Every AI-assisted paragraph should be rewritten in your voice. If you can't claim the sentence, fix it or cut it.
- Log what's AI-assisted. Maintain a short process note: where AI helped, what you kept, what you changed. It protects you during edits and contract discussions.
- Use version control. Lock a clean "print candidate" version that contains only narrative, no prompt residue.
Pre-publication QA checklist (share with your editor)
- Global search for "Prompt:", "System:", "Assistant:", "User:", "AI:", "I will now", "continue the narrative", and similar scaffolding phrases.
- Remove bracketed notes: [expand], [insert backstory], [rewrite], [fact-check].
- Check tense and POV consistency after AI rewrites.
- Run an out-loud read of any section you touched with AI - it exposes robotic rhythms fast.
Transparency without over-sharing
Disclose the method, not the mess. If AI materially assisted, add a brief acknowledgment or note in the back matter. Keep it factual and calm. Over-explaining invites confusion; zero disclosure invites backlash.
If you need policy language or contract guidance, consult professional bodies that are tracking this space, such as the Authors Guild's AI advocacy resources.
Publisher-side policy (essentials)
- Require authors to declare AI assistance and maintain private process notes.
- Add AI-artifact scans to copyedit checklists.
- Clarify credit and liability in contracts: who is responsible for AI-origin content, and what must be disclosed.
- Train editors to spot prompt residue and mechanical prose patterns.
What happened next
As of now, CIBF organisers and the cited publishers have not issued detailed public responses addressing the specific titles shown in the widely shared images. The incident has already pushed fresh debate among writers and houses about how generative tools are used - and what must be disclosed and edited before anything goes to print.
Bottom line for working writers
AI can accelerate drafts, but you own the final page. Keep prompts out of production files, enforce a hard edit, and be clear about your process. That's how you protect your name - and your readers' trust.
Further learning
- Practical prompt and workflow tutorials for creators: Prompt Engineering (Complete AI Training)
Your membership also unlocks:
