Hacking Higher Ed: Where Does AI Cross the Line?
Artificial intelligence is no longer a future concept; it's in every classroom. Students are using tools like ChatGPT for everything, forcing a hard look at what education is for. Is AI just a better calculator, or is it a shortcut that robs students of the ability to think for themselves?
New York Magazine's James Walsh, whose article "Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College" ignited a national conversation, sees this as a fundamental challenge to the entire academic project. When AI can produce a passing grade, how can educators maintain fairness and how can students find meaning in their work?
The Academic Project Unravels
According to Walsh, ChatGPT has made cheating incredibly easy. A student can take any assignment, feed it to an AI, and submit the result as their own. This accessibility forces professors to question the very purpose of their assignments.
If an essay can be hacked in minutes, what is its educational value? Are we teaching students to write, or just to complete a task? This line of questioning quickly leads to a bigger one: Why are we here? What is the point of college if the work can be outsourced to a machine?
A Universal Problem
This isn't a niche issue confined to specific schools. Walsh's reporting shows that from community colleges to the Ivy League, and even down to high schools, educators are grappling with this. Everyone is affected.
Students use AI on a spectrum. Some use it productively to analyze data or brainstorm ideas. But the core concern is the students who use it to write entire essays in an hour, bypassing the learning process altogether.
The Student's Justification
Many students don't see this as cheating. They rationalize it. Walsh found that a common view is, "This is a tool I will have for the rest of my life, so I might as well get good at it now." They believe building AI fluency is a practical skill for the future workforce.
Walsh shared an anecdote about a student named Wendy. She woke up the morning an essay was due and used ChatGPT to engineer the entire paper. She outsourced the thinking-asking the AI for a thesis and bullet points-while she physically typed the words. She admitted she missed "writing the way I did in high school," but felt pressure to use AI because everyone else was.
Another student told Walsh he understood the value of a handwritten note. That's why he sends them, he said, but only after drafting the letter using AI first. There's a disconnect between understanding the value of an act and performing the act itself.
The Professor's Crisis
Educators are overwhelmed. The sudden arrival of AI has turned them into detectives. On top of teaching and grading, they now have to police for AI-generated work. It's a losing battle. It's nearly impossible to prove an essay was written by AI, and leveling that accusation is a serious step.
Worse, professors aren't good at spotting it. One study showed that when AI-generated work was slipped into a grading pile, professors failed to flag it 97% of the time. The AI detection tools are also unreliable. Walsh tested one by feeding it text from the Book of Genesis; it came back as 98% likely to be AI-generated.
This throws the entire grading system into chaos. A teaching assistant Walsh spoke to quit his job over this dilemma. He couldn't figure out how to grade a decent AI-generated paper against a poorly written, but clearly human, one. It creates an impossible conflict.
The Arms Race: "AI-Proofing" Assignments
Professors are trying to adapt. Some are returning to old methods, like in-class oral exams and handwritten essays in Blue Books. These methods ensure the student knows the material but take up immense amounts of time and don't test the same skills as writing a paper.
Others are getting creative. Walsh described professors embedding strange words like "broccoli" or "Dua Lipa" in tiny text within an essay prompt. The idea is to catch the laziest students who copy and paste without reading the output. If an essay on the Civil War mentions Dua Lipa, you know something is wrong.
Cognitive Decay and the Worthless Diploma
The problem goes deeper than cheating. Offloading cognitive work to chatbots has consequences. Early research points to memory problems, a decline in problem-solving skills, and reduced creativity. When you don't use your brain to think, it gets worse at thinking.
This leads to the most frightening possibility: an entire generation of college graduates who lack basic critical thinking skills. If students can get a degree without learning how to analyze information or form an original thought, the value of that diploma plummets. Employers will notice.
Where Do We Draw the Line?
The tool isn't going away. AI companies are actively marketing to students, even making premium versions free during finals. The urgent question for every educator is: at what point does using AI stop being helpful and start undermining education?
This requires professors to justify every assignment and define exactly what students should be allowed to use AI for. It's not about banning the technology, but about understanding it. For educators, the first step is to become fluent in the very tools their students are using. Exploring courses on ChatGPT and other AI platforms is no longer optional; it's essential for designing a modern curriculum.
Ultimately, this forces students and educators alike to confront an age-old question, now with renewed urgency: What are you paying for? Are you paying for a piece of paper, or are you paying to learn how to think?
Your membership also unlocks:
