Propositions LL and MM: What Writers Need to Know About Colorado's Free School Meals
Two ballot measures - LL and MM - will decide what happens next with Colorado's free school meals program. That's a real story with stakes: kids, families, budgets, and local schools.
If you write for newsrooms, nonprofits, or brands with a civic audience, this is your window. Your job is to cut through noise, verify essentials, and make the path clear for readers who will vote.
What's at stake
- Whether the state continues, changes, or ends free school meals.
- How schools fund and deliver those meals.
- Impacts on families, especially low-income and food-insecure households.
- Administrative load on districts and cafeteria staff.
Before you publish: facts to confirm
- Exact ballot language for LL and MM.
- How each measure changes current policy, funding, or eligibility.
- Projected costs, funding sources, and any tax implications.
- School district participation rates and meal uptake data.
- Arguments from official pro/con committees and major stakeholders.
Start here for official summaries and neutral framing: Ballotpedia: Colorado ballot measures. For program background and statewide context, check the state's nutrition hub: Colorado Department of Education: Nutrition.
Angles you can pitch
- The kitchen table view: how a yes/no vote changes a family's monthly budget.
- School operations: staffing, food sourcing, and logistics if LL/MM pass or fail.
- Equity lens: stigma reduction, participation rates, and student outcomes tied to meals.
- Local business ripple effects: vendors, farmers, and supply partnerships.
- Data-forward explainer: what the latest numbers actually show (participation, costs, outcomes).
- Voter's guide in 500 words: clear, sourced, neutral.
People to interview
- Food service directors and cafeteria managers.
- Principals, teachers, and school social workers.
- Parents and students from diverse income brackets and regions.
- Budget officers at district and state levels.
- Public health experts and nutrition researchers.
- Opposition and support campaign leads.
Questions that unlock useful quotes
- What changes on day one if LL or MM pass? What changes if they fail?
- How many students in your district rely on free meals daily? How has that changed over time?
- What's your current cost per meal, and what's driving it up or down?
- Where are the bottlenecks: staffing, supply, kitchens, reporting?
- If funding shifts, what gets cut or reprioritized?
- What does a "good" outcome look like to you, and how would you measure it a year later?
Data and documents worth pulling
- State and district meal participation reports.
- Budget line items for nutrition, equipment, and staffing.
- Independent evaluations on academic attendance and concentration tied to meal access.
- Vendor contracts and local sourcing agreements.
- Official voter guide and fiscal notes.
Short style guide for clarity
- Use plain language. Define any policy terms in one line.
- Lead with what changes for families and schools. Then explain why.
- Show the money: who pays, how much, and where it goes.
- Keep quotes specific. Cut platitudes.
- Add a "What this means for you" box or paragraph near the top.
Sample headlines
- LL and MM: What Your Vote Means for Free School Meals in Colorado
- Free School Meals at Risk or Renewed? A Clear Guide to LL and MM
- Families, Budgets, and Lunch Trays: The Stakes of LL and MM
Newsletter blurb (copy, paste, tweak)
What's happening: Two measures, LL and MM, will decide the future of Colorado's free school meals program. Your vote could affect funding, eligibility, and what schools can deliver next year.
Why it matters: Hundreds of thousands of students rely on these meals. The measures could change how districts budget, staff, and source food.
What to know: Read the official summaries, check costs, and scan local school impact before you vote.
Social copy ideas
- LL + MM are on the ballot. They decide what happens next with free school meals in CO. Here's what changes - and who it affects.
- Parents, teachers, voters: LL and MM could shift how schools fund and serve lunch. Get the facts, then vote.
Ethics check
- Label advocacy as advocacy. Label analysis as analysis.
- Balance cost discussions with student outcomes and access.
- Avoid guilt framing. Center clear trade-offs and verified data.
- Disclose any affiliations or funding ties in your reporting.
Your next steps
- Pull official ballot text and fiscal notes. Summarize in 5 bullets.
- Interview one district lead, one cafeteria manager, one parent.
- Build a simple "If pass / If fail" callout for readers.
- Publish a neutral explainer. Follow with a reported feature on lived impact.
Want to speed up outlines and fact sheets?
Use AI to draft structure, then verify every claim with primary sources. For tool roundups that help writers work faster without losing accuracy, see this list: AI tools for copywriting.
Your membership also unlocks:
