Colorado’s AI Law Sets a New Standard for U.S. States
Starting February 1, 2026, Colorado will enforce one of the most comprehensive AI laws in the United States. This legislation demands that companies using or developing "high-risk" AI systems implement formal risk management programs. These systems influence critical decisions in sectors such as education, employment, lending, healthcare, and insurance.
Unlike most state regulations that target specific AI applications or industries, Colorado’s law covers a broad range of AI uses. It requires businesses to conduct impact assessments, establish oversight procedures, and develop mitigation strategies. These measures must be reported to the state attorney general and, in certain situations, disclosed to consumers, especially if algorithmic discrimination is detected.
High Compliance Bar for Companies
Companies face significant new obligations under this law. Both developers and deployers of AI systems have distinct responsibilities. Deployers must assess risks and inform consumers about their AI risk management practices. Developers need to demonstrate how they prevent algorithmic bias and publish details about their systems and controls.
This layered approach increases compliance complexity and demands dedicated resources. Legal and compliance teams will need to adapt to these requirements well before the law takes effect. Starting preparations in the early months of 2026 may prove too late for many organizations.
Exemptions and Risk Management Frameworks
The legislation includes exemptions for small deployers, federally regulated AI systems, research activities, and lower-risk AI technologies. To help structure compliance efforts, experts recommend using the NIST AI Risk Management Framework as a foundation. This framework can also serve as a legal defense if enforcement actions arise.
While the law doesn’t specify penalties, violations are treated as unfair trade practices under Colorado’s consumer protection statutes. These violations can result in civil penalties of up to $20,000 per occurrence.
Potential Ripple Effects Across the U.S.
After the U.S. Senate removed a clause that would have prevented states from regulating AI for a decade, more states are likely to introduce their own AI laws. Some, like New York and California, might develop comprehensive frameworks similar to Colorado’s.
Colorado’s law could become a model if the legislature refines its provisions to reduce burdens or clarify requirements. This could encourage other states to adopt similar legislation, creating a more uniform regulatory environment for AI.
Preparing for Compliance
Legal professionals advising companies with AI products or deployments should start evaluating their clients’ risk management systems now. Understanding the scope of “high-risk” AI and aligning with frameworks such as NIST will be critical.
For those looking to deepen their expertise in AI compliance and governance, exploring specialized courses can be beneficial. Resources are available at Complete AI Training, offering focused content on AI laws and risk management strategies.
Your membership also unlocks:
