Console Hires Seer Builder Rohan Agarwal to Build 0-to-1, Creativity-Focused AI

Console hires AI/ML engineer Rohan Agarwal, ex-Sentry Seer builder and artist, hinting at creative, 0-to-1 product bets. Details on scope, revenue, and timing remain TBD.

Categorized in: AI News Product Development
Published on: Feb 21, 2026
Console Hires Seer Builder Rohan Agarwal to Build 0-to-1, Creativity-Focused AI

Console's New AI Hire Signals Creative, 0-to-1 Product Bets

Console announced the hiring of AI/ML engineer Rohan Agarwal. He was among the early AI/ML engineers at Sentry and reportedly helped build its agentic AI product, Seer, from inception.

The post also highlights Agarwal's research on human-AI co-creativity at Georgia Tech and his background as an artist with work exhibited at The Met. For product teams, this mix points to creativity-oriented AI features and a push for 0-to-1 execution. The post doesn't outline specific products, revenue impact, or timelines, but the talent profile hints at a pipeline in motion.

Why this matters for product development

  • Agentic AI experience suggests deeper automation and workflow ownership inside the product, not just surface-level assistants. See AI Agents & Automation for frameworks and orchestration patterns.
  • Human-AI co-creativity research implies UX that augments users' taste, decisions, and output quality-useful for ideation, iteration, and review loops.
  • 0-to-1 background signals bias toward shipping end-to-end slices, not research for its own sake.

Likely product bets to explore

  • In-product agents that triage, draft, and resolve tasks across support, QA, content ops, or growth experiments.
  • Co-creative flows: suggestion engines, structured brainstorming, variant generation, and critique loops that keep users in control.
  • Closed-loop learning: capture feedback, outcomes, and preference signals to improve prompts, tools, and policies over time.
  • Trust features: audit trails, source citations, and safe-mode toggles to align output with policy and brand.

Signals to validate before committing roadmap

  • Problem depth: Which user jobs have high friction and repetitive steps that an agent can own end-to-end?
  • Data readiness: Do we have high-quality context (tickets, docs, logs, CRM) and tool access (APIs) for reliable actions?
  • Cost envelope: Can we keep unit economics healthy (latency, token spend, retries) at projected volume?
  • Safety: What's the failure policy, rollback path, and human-in-the-loop checkpoint for sensitive actions?

Team and hiring implications

  • Prioritize engineers who ship thin vertical slices: model choice, tool wiring, evals, and UI-end to end.
  • Fluency with LLM tool use, retrieval, and agent frameworks-plus a habit of writing evals early.
  • Strong product instincts: instrument co-creative UX, not just "chat in a box."
  • Partner closely with design and research to measure delight, control, and trust-not only accuracy.

90-day execution plan (practical)

  • Weeks 1-2: Map top 3 candidate workflows by pain, frequency, and data/tool access. Pick one with clear success criteria.
  • Weeks 3-4: Ship a stub agent with guardrails. Log every step, capture human edits, and measure quality/latency/cost.
  • Weeks 5-8: Add tools (search, ticketing, CRM, code ops). Write evals for edge cases. Tighten prompts and policies.
  • Weeks 9-12: Expand scope carefully. Run A/Bs vs. current flow. Publish a short "trust & safety" spec for stakeholders.

Metrics that matter

  • Time-to-first-value and cycle time reduction per workflow.
  • Task completion rate without human correction; edit distance when corrections occur.
  • Agent autonomy ratio: steps done by the agent vs. the user.
  • User satisfaction with control and confidence (not just CSAT).
  • Cost per successful action, including retries and tool calls.

Risks and open questions

The post centers on credentials, not strategy. There's no detail on product scope, revenue impact, or timelines.

  • Where will agents own full workflows vs. assist? What's the escalation path?
  • How will proprietary data and compliance be handled across tools and vendors?
  • What's the defensibility: unique data, distribution, or UX?
  • What monetization model fits (seat, usage, workflow add-on)?

What to watch next

  • Additional hires across data, platform, and design that enable agentic features.
  • Early pilots in high-leverage workflows and public demos with measurable outcomes.
  • Partner integrations that unlock tool access (support, code, analytics) for agents.
  • A clear point of view on co-creative UX-how humans set direction and review output.

If you're planning similar bets, these resources can help: AI for Product Development.


Get Daily AI News

Your membership also unlocks:

700+ AI Courses
700+ Certifications
Personalized AI Learning Plan
6500+ AI Tools (no Ads)
Daily AI News by job industry (no Ads)